A criminal, or not a criminal? That is the question: Egyptians’ attitudinal positioning in YouTube comments

The present study examines a sample of the written comments and replies to a YouTubed confession video of the murder case of a female student by her male colleague that sparked an immense amount of dispute among Egyptians on social media. The main aim is to find the users’ attitudinal positioning through the analysis of their evaluative language and the way it is constructed. Relying on a qualitative approach with discourse analysis techniques, Martin and White's (2005) Appraisal framework is applied, as it provides the text-analytical tools required to identify and distinguish the various appraisal systems employed. The study focuses on two main aspects: affect (emotion) and judgment (ethics), along with their sub-types. The findings of the paper reflect an evaluation gamut of certain attitudes which mainly blame the victim; such a gamut seems to be underlain by a patriarchal gender ideology that still pervades today's Egyptian society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Arabic Sociolinguistics
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/arabic.2026.0066
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A criminal, or not a criminal? That is the question: Egyptians’ attitudinal positioning in YouTube comments

Dalia Hammoud
Journal of Arabic Sociolinguistics
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

A criminal, or not a criminal? That is the question: Egyptians’ attitudinal positioning in YouTube comments

Dalia Hammoud
article en

Abstract

The present study examines a sample of the written comments and replies to a YouTubed confession video of the murder case of a female student by her male colleague that sparked an immense amount of dispute among Egyptians on social media. The main aim is to find the users’ attitudinal positioning through the analysis of their evaluative language and the way it is constructed. Relying on a qualitative approach with discourse analysis techniques, Martin and White's (2005) Appraisal framework is applied, as it provides the text-analytical tools required to identify and distinguish the various appraisal systems employed. The study focuses on two main aspects: affect (emotion) and judgment (ethics), along with their sub-types. The findings of the paper reflect an evaluation gamut of certain attitudes which mainly blame the victim; such a gamut seems to be underlain by a patriarchal gender ideology that still pervades today's Egyptian society.

Journal of Arabic SociolinguisticsVol. 4(2)
Alexandria University (EG)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A criminal, or not a criminal? That is the question: Egyptians’ attitudinal positioning in YouTube comments — Dalia Hammoud · Journal of Arabic Sociolinguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS