Survey of National Approaches to Practice in Local Anaesthetic Rhinology Surgery ( SNAP ‐ LARS ): A United Kingdom National Cross‐Sectional Collaborative Survey

INTRODUCTION: Local anaesthetic rhinology surgery (LARS) offers a safe and cost-effective alternative to procedures traditionally performed under general anaesthesia. Despite publication of British Rhinological Society guidance in 2022, the landscape of LARS provision in the United Kingdom (UK) remains unclear. This study aimed to characterise current practice, whilst highlighting variations and perceived barriers to LARS. METHODS: A cross-sectional national multi-centre collaborative survey was conducted between October 2025 and February 2026. The protocol followed the CROSS reporting checklist for survey studies. Only endonasal procedures were included. Each response captured a consultant's typical LARS practice over the preceding 12 months. Free-text responses underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-three consultant responses from 39 sites were analysed. The most frequently performed procedures were endonasal biopsy (n = 60, 95.2%), septal button insertion (n = 46, 73.0%) and nasal polypectomy (n = 35, 55.6%). Most consultants performed ≤ 30 cases annually (76.2%) and typically ran one LARS session per month (76.2%). Most cases (76.6%) were performed in operating theatres. Sedation was offered by 19.0% (n = 12), and most patients were discharged within 2 h (n = 57, 90.5%). Routine PROM collection was only reported by 49.2% (n = 31). Utilisation of reusable equipment varied widely, with 47.6% (n = 30) using ≤ 50% reusable equipment. Barriers to service expansion included space, equipment, staffing and funding. CONCLUSION: LARS is delivered through heterogeneous models, and responses showed skew towards England. There is considerable opportunity to expand outpatient procedure-room delivery, standardise care pathways and outcome measurement, and address organisational barriers. These could enhance efficiency, reduce costs, minimise environmental impact, and ultimately improve patient experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Otolaryngology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.70162
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survey of National Approaches to Practice in Local Anaesthetic Rhinology Surgery ( SNAP ‐ LARS ): A United Kingdom National Cross‐Sectional Collaborative Survey

M Pankhania, Shayan Shahidi, Behrad Barmayehvar, Tharsika Myuran et al.
Clinical Otolaryngology
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

Survey of National Approaches to Practice in Local Anaesthetic Rhinology Surgery ( SNAP ‐ LARS ): A United Kingdom National Cross‐Sectional Collaborative Survey

M Pankhania, Shayan Shahidi, Behrad Barmayehvar, Tharsika Myuran, Ding Yang, Dhruv Patel, Ashok Rokade, BRSJ collaborators, Vikas Acharya, Raj K. Bhalla
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Local anaesthetic rhinology surgery (LARS) offers a safe and cost-effective alternative to procedures traditionally performed under general anaesthesia. Despite publication of British Rhinological Society guidance in 2022, the landscape of LARS provision in the United Kingdom (UK) remains unclear. This study aimed to characterise current practice, whilst highlighting variations and perceived barriers to LARS. METHODS: A cross-sectional national multi-centre collaborative survey was conducted between October 2025 and February 2026. The protocol followed the CROSS reporting checklist for survey studies. Only endonasal procedures were included. Each response captured a consultant's typical LARS practice over the preceding 12 months. Free-text responses underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-three consultant responses from 39 sites were analysed. The most frequently performed procedures were endonasal biopsy (n = 60, 95.2%), septal button insertion (n = 46, 73.0%) and nasal polypectomy (n = 35, 55.6%). Most consultants performed ≤ 30 cases annually (76.2%) and typically ran one LARS session per month (76.2%). Most cases (76.6%) were performed in operating theatres. Sedation was offered by 19.0% (n = 12), and most patients were discharged within 2 h (n = 57, 90.5%). Routine PROM collection was only reported by 49.2% (n = 31). Utilisation of reusable equipment varied widely, with 47.6% (n = 30) using ≤ 50% reusable equipment. Barriers to service expansion included space, equipment, staffing and funding. CONCLUSION: LARS is delivered through heterogeneous models, and responses showed skew towards England. There is considerable opportunity to expand outpatient procedure-room delivery, standardise care pathways and outcome measurement, and address organisational barriers. These could enhance efficiency, reduce costs, minimise environmental impact, and ultimately improve patient experience.

Clinical Otolaryngology
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Charing Cross Hospital (GB), Queen Alexandra Hospital (GB), Royal Hampshire County Hospital (GB), Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Rotherham General Hospital (GB), The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Salford Royal Hospital (GB), University College London (GB)
British Rhinological Society
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.