Black power vs. white capital: Obsolescing political legitimacy and the unravelling of colonial capitalism in Northern Rhodesia

In the broader context of decolonisation, corporate asset expropriation and nationalisation were widespread. Yet, in a notable departure, the British South Africa Company (BSAC) agreed to transfer its Northern Rhodesian mineral rights to Zambia’s incoming government just hours before independence in 1964. The settlement represented only a fraction of the value the company had previously attached to the rights. Drawing on the obsolescing political legitimacy (OPL) framework, this paper examines how competing actors assessed and negotiated the legitimacy of the BSAC’s mineral rights during the transition to independence. It argues that the settlement cannot be understood solely as a bargaining dispute over compensation. Using archival evidence, the paper shows how disputes over the legitimacy of colonial property rights shaped negotiations among colonial, imperial, corporate, and nationalist actors during the transition to independence, offering a reinterpretation of the BSAC settlement as a struggle over the legitimacy of colonial capitalism during decolonisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business History
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2026.2720667
Primary Topic
African studies and sociopolitical issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Black power vs. white capital: Obsolescing political legitimacy and the unravelling of colonial capitalism in Northern Rhodesia

Kondwani Happy Ngoma
Business History
African studies and sociopolitical issues
article

Black power vs. white capital: Obsolescing political legitimacy and the unravelling of colonial capitalism in Northern Rhodesia

Kondwani Happy Ngoma
article en

Abstract

In the broader context of decolonisation, corporate asset expropriation and nationalisation were widespread. Yet, in a notable departure, the British South Africa Company (BSAC) agreed to transfer its Northern Rhodesian mineral rights to Zambia’s incoming government just hours before independence in 1964. The settlement represented only a fraction of the value the company had previously attached to the rights. Drawing on the obsolescing political legitimacy (OPL) framework, this paper examines how competing actors assessed and negotiated the legitimacy of the BSAC’s mineral rights during the transition to independence. It argues that the settlement cannot be understood solely as a bargaining dispute over compensation. Using archival evidence, the paper shows how disputes over the legitimacy of colonial property rights shaped negotiations among colonial, imperial, corporate, and nationalist actors during the transition to independence, offering a reinterpretation of the BSAC settlement as a struggle over the legitimacy of colonial capitalism during decolonisation.

Business History
Center for Strategic Research (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
African studies and sociopolitical issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.