Cancer Biologics Utilization After Biosimilar Entry and Financial Implications For Payers and Patients

Importance: Biosimilars are highly similar to originator biologics and were introduced to increase market competition, lower the price of biologics, and expand patient access by improving affordability. By the end of 2024, three anticancer biologics have experienced biosimilar entry in the US (bevacizumab, rituximab, and trastuzumab), underscoring the need to evaluate their financial implications for payers and patients. Objective: To assess market dynamics and examine financial implications associated with biosimilar use patterns among patients who received bevacizumab, rituximab, or trastuzumab. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort examined price and market share trends and payer and patient costs after biosimilar entry. It used data from the Merative MarketScan commercial database and Medicare database from July 2019 to December 2024. Based on use patterns within 12 months of treatment initiation, patients were categorized into 4 groups: those who exclusively used biosimilars, exclusively used the reference product (ie, originator biologics), switched from the reference product to biosimilars, and switched from biosimilars to the reference product. Data were analyzed between September 2025 and March 2026. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary study outcomes were average sales price (ASP), market share of reference products, and mean monthly payer and out-of-pocket costs within the study period. Results: Among 14 655 patients in this study, the mean (SD) age was 57 (13) years, 9985 (68.1%) were female, and the most common cancers were breast cancer (5182 [35.4%]), lymphoma (4320 [29.5%]), and colorectal cancer (1998 [13.6%]). A total of 8710 patients (59.4%) exclusively used biosimilars, 4760 (32.5%) exclusively used the reference product, 1015 (6.9%) switched from the reference product to biosimilars, and 170 (1.2%) switched from biosimilars to the reference product. After biosimilar entry, the ASP of the 3 reference products declined by an average of 3.8% annually. Their market share decreased 30% annually in commercial insurance and 31.5% in the Medicare Part B market. Compared with patients who only used the reference product, those who only used biosimilars rendered a $3820 lower mean monthly payer cost and $39.50 lower mean monthly out-of-pocket cost. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that biosimilar entry was associated with lower ASP and reduced market share for reference biologics in oncology. Market competition introduced by biosimilars was also associated with lowered payer costs and reduced patient financial burden.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Oncology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2026.3128
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cancer Biologics Utilization After Biosimilar Entry and Financial Implications For Payers and Patients

Xiaoyu Liu, Xiaoyi Xu, Z John Lu, Ya-Chen Tina Shih
JAMA Oncology
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

Cancer Biologics Utilization After Biosimilar Entry and Financial Implications For Payers and Patients

Xiaoyu Liu, Xiaoyi Xu, Z John Lu, Ya-Chen Tina Shih
article en

Abstract

Importance: Biosimilars are highly similar to originator biologics and were introduced to increase market competition, lower the price of biologics, and expand patient access by improving affordability. By the end of 2024, three anticancer biologics have experienced biosimilar entry in the US (bevacizumab, rituximab, and trastuzumab), underscoring the need to evaluate their financial implications for payers and patients. Objective: To assess market dynamics and examine financial implications associated with biosimilar use patterns among patients who received bevacizumab, rituximab, or trastuzumab. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort examined price and market share trends and payer and patient costs after biosimilar entry. It used data from the Merative MarketScan commercial database and Medicare database from July 2019 to December 2024. Based on use patterns within 12 months of treatment initiation, patients were categorized into 4 groups: those who exclusively used biosimilars, exclusively used the reference product (ie, originator biologics), switched from the reference product to biosimilars, and switched from biosimilars to the reference product. Data were analyzed between September 2025 and March 2026. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary study outcomes were average sales price (ASP), market share of reference products, and mean monthly payer and out-of-pocket costs within the study period. Results: Among 14 655 patients in this study, the mean (SD) age was 57 (13) years, 9985 (68.1%) were female, and the most common cancers were breast cancer (5182 [35.4%]), lymphoma (4320 [29.5%]), and colorectal cancer (1998 [13.6%]). A total of 8710 patients (59.4%) exclusively used biosimilars, 4760 (32.5%) exclusively used the reference product, 1015 (6.9%) switched from the reference product to biosimilars, and 170 (1.2%) switched from biosimilars to the reference product. After biosimilar entry, the ASP of the 3 reference products declined by an average of 3.8% annually. Their market share decreased 30% annually in commercial insurance and 31.5% in the Medicare Part B market. Compared with patients who only used the reference product, those who only used biosimilars rendered a $3820 lower mean monthly payer cost and $39.50 lower mean monthly out-of-pocket cost. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that biosimilar entry was associated with lower ASP and reduced market share for reference biologics in oncology. Market competition introduced by biosimilars was also associated with lowered payer costs and reduced patient financial burden.

JAMA Oncology
University of California, Los Angeles (US), USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.