The practice of using research well in schools

Background Efforts to strengthen the use of research evidence in educational policy and practice improvement are widespread internationally. There are growing calls for research use in education not only to be better supported, but also better understood. In particular, there is a need for empirical insights into the process of using research well, as a practice, from a practitioner perspective.Purpose This article seeks to address this need by shedding light on what using research well in schools looks like and feels like for educators. It is distinctive in sharing empirical (as opposed to conceptual) findings about using research well and presenting inductive (as opposed to deductive) insights into educators’ perspectives.Method The work was based on thematic analyses of qualitative surveys (n = 492) and interviews (n = 27) with teachers and school leaders across 414 schools in four Australian states. As part of a wider five-year study, the data collection processes were deliberately exploratory with the aim of listening to educators’ views about what they believed was involved in using research well in practice.Findings The analysis identified six characteristics of using research well that were important to study participants. These portrayed the practice as: purposeful; curiosity-driven; collective; professional; embedded; and time- and effort-dependent.Conclusion The study illustrates that using research well is about practice as much as it is about research; it is an invested, professional undertaking; and it is a social and organisational process. These insights suggest that approaches to research-informed improvement should recognise the centrality of practice, the significance of professionalism and the importance of process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Research
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2026.2718892
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The practice of using research well in schools

Lucas Walsh, Mark Rickinson, Joanne Gleeson, Blake Cutler
Educational Research
Educational Assessment and Improvement
article

The practice of using research well in schools

Lucas Walsh, Mark Rickinson, Joanne Gleeson, Blake Cutler
article en

Abstract

Background Efforts to strengthen the use of research evidence in educational policy and practice improvement are widespread internationally. There are growing calls for research use in education not only to be better supported, but also better understood. In particular, there is a need for empirical insights into the process of using research well, as a practice, from a practitioner perspective.Purpose This article seeks to address this need by shedding light on what using research well in schools looks like and feels like for educators. It is distinctive in sharing empirical (as opposed to conceptual) findings about using research well and presenting inductive (as opposed to deductive) insights into educators’ perspectives.Method The work was based on thematic analyses of qualitative surveys (n = 492) and interviews (n = 27) with teachers and school leaders across 414 schools in four Australian states. As part of a wider five-year study, the data collection processes were deliberately exploratory with the aim of listening to educators’ views about what they believed was involved in using research well in practice.Findings The analysis identified six characteristics of using research well that were important to study participants. These portrayed the practice as: purposeful; curiosity-driven; collective; professional; embedded; and time- and effort-dependent.Conclusion The study illustrates that using research well is about practice as much as it is about research; it is an invested, professional undertaking; and it is a social and organisational process. These insights suggest that approaches to research-informed improvement should recognise the centrality of practice, the significance of professionalism and the importance of process.

Educational Research
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Paul Ramsay Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.