Reaction Mechanism and Kinetics of Criegee Intermediate Formation in the Ozonolysis of a Marine Chlorinated Monoterpene: A Three-Channel Master-Equation Analysis

Atmospheric ozonolysis of halogenated monoterpenes from marine red macroalgae proceeds through pre-reactive complexes, primary ozonides, Criegee intermediates, and carbonyl products. Structure–activity relationship (SAR) schemes, such as that of Khan et al. (2022) for nineteen Plocamium-derived monoterpenes, return only a single rate coefficient per channel, with no information on intermediates, energy partitioning or pressure dependence. Here all three ozone-attack channels of Compound 1, 5,6-dichloro-2-chloromethylene-6-methyl-octa-3,7-dienal (C₁₀H₁₁Cl₃O) — the terminal Δ⁷ vinyl, the internal Δ³ double bond, and the chloromethylene Δ¹ group — are characterized with a quantum-chemical/master-equation workflow (ωB97X-D3BJ/def2-TZVP; DLPNO-CCSD(T)/def2-TZVPP; ORCA 6.1; MESMER 7.1) on a single workstation. All three channels proceed over tight, first-order cycloaddition transition states to deep primary ozonides and on to chlorinated carbonyl + Criegee pairs. The internal Δ³ cycloaddition, initially suspected to be barrierless along the single-bond approach coordinate, is shown by a synchronous two-bond scan, transition-state optimization and intrinsic-reaction-coordinate analysis to possess a genuine concerted ring-closure saddle (one imaginary mode, −310 cm⁻¹) at +9.57 kcal mol⁻¹ — the highest of the three entrance barriers, above the terminal Δ⁷ (+7.02) and chloromethylene Δ¹ (+6.67 kcal mol⁻¹) channels. The resulting 298 K, 760 Torr rate coefficients are kΔ⁷ = 2.50 × 10⁻²¹, kΔ¹ = 1.45 × 10⁻²² and kΔ³ = 1.53 × 10⁻²³ cm³ molecule⁻¹ s⁻¹, giving a channel ordering Δ⁷ > Δ¹ > Δ³ (≈94 : 5 : 1). This confirms the SAR/MCM picture of Khan et al. on the dominant site — the terminal Δ⁷ vinyl — but reassigns the minor chemistry: the internal Δ³ double bond, treated by SAR/MCM as the secondary site (~7%), is found to be the slowest channel (~1%), while the chloromethylene Δ¹ group not considered by SAR emerges as the true secondary channel (~5%). Notably, the ordering is not set by barrier height alone. Although Δ¹ has the lowest barrier, its tighter transition state (a smaller rovibrational partition function) makes it slower than Δ⁷, so the channel selectivity reflects a balance of entropic and enthalpic factors rather than barrier height in isolation. Pressure-dependent collisional stabilization of the primary ozonides — inaccessible to SAR — is significant at atmospheric pressure, with prompt Criegee yields of ~28% (Δ⁷). Benchmarking the identical workflow against ethene ozonolysis reproduces the experimental barrier to within 0.4 kcal mol⁻¹ (5.3 versus ~4.95 kcal mol⁻¹), indicating that the total rate, which lies about three orders of magnitude below the group-additivity SAR estimate, reflects overestimation by the SAR scheme for this chlorinated, conjugated substrate rather than an offset in the computed barriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A Chemistry
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.1971728
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reaction Mechanism and Kinetics of Criegee Intermediate Formation in the Ozonolysis of a Marine Chlorinated Monoterpene: A Three-Channel Master-Equation Analysis

Asan Bacak
Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A Chemistry
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
article

Reaction Mechanism and Kinetics of Criegee Intermediate Formation in the Ozonolysis of a Marine Chlorinated Monoterpene: A Three-Channel Master-Equation Analysis

Asan Bacak
article en

Abstract

Atmospheric ozonolysis of halogenated monoterpenes from marine red macroalgae proceeds through pre-reactive complexes, primary ozonides, Criegee intermediates, and carbonyl products. Structure–activity relationship (SAR) schemes, such as that of Khan et al. (2022) for nineteen Plocamium-derived monoterpenes, return only a single rate coefficient per channel, with no information on intermediates, energy partitioning or pressure dependence. Here all three ozone-attack channels of Compound 1, 5,6-dichloro-2-chloromethylene-6-methyl-octa-3,7-dienal (C₁₀H₁₁Cl₃O) — the terminal Δ⁷ vinyl, the internal Δ³ double bond, and the chloromethylene Δ¹ group — are characterized with a quantum-chemical/master-equation workflow (ωB97X-D3BJ/def2-TZVP; DLPNO-CCSD(T)/def2-TZVPP; ORCA 6.1; MESMER 7.1) on a single workstation. All three channels proceed over tight, first-order cycloaddition transition states to deep primary ozonides and on to chlorinated carbonyl + Criegee pairs. The internal Δ³ cycloaddition, initially suspected to be barrierless along the single-bond approach coordinate, is shown by a synchronous two-bond scan, transition-state optimization and intrinsic-reaction-coordinate analysis to possess a genuine concerted ring-closure saddle (one imaginary mode, −310 cm⁻¹) at +9.57 kcal mol⁻¹ — the highest of the three entrance barriers, above the terminal Δ⁷ (+7.02) and chloromethylene Δ¹ (+6.67 kcal mol⁻¹) channels. The resulting 298 K, 760 Torr rate coefficients are kΔ⁷ = 2.50 × 10⁻²¹, kΔ¹ = 1.45 × 10⁻²² and kΔ³ = 1.53 × 10⁻²³ cm³ molecule⁻¹ s⁻¹, giving a channel ordering Δ⁷ > Δ¹ > Δ³ (≈94 : 5 : 1). This confirms the SAR/MCM picture of Khan et al. on the dominant site — the terminal Δ⁷ vinyl — but reassigns the minor chemistry: the internal Δ³ double bond, treated by SAR/MCM as the secondary site (~7%), is found to be the slowest channel (~1%), while the chloromethylene Δ¹ group not considered by SAR emerges as the true secondary channel (~5%). Notably, the ordering is not set by barrier height alone. Although Δ¹ has the lowest barrier, its tighter transition state (a smaller rovibrational partition function) makes it slower than Δ⁷, so the channel selectivity reflects a balance of entropic and enthalpic factors rather than barrier height in isolation. Pressure-dependent collisional stabilization of the primary ozonides — inaccessible to SAR — is significant at atmospheric pressure, with prompt Criegee yields of ~28% (Δ⁷). Benchmarking the identical workflow against ethene ozonolysis reproduces the experimental barrier to within 0.4 kcal mol⁻¹ (5.3 versus ~4.95 kcal mol⁻¹), indicating that the total rate, which lies about three orders of magnitude below the group-additivity SAR estimate, reflects overestimation by the SAR scheme for this chlorinated, conjugated substrate rather than an offset in the computed barriers.

Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A ChemistryVol. 2026(2)
Ankara University (TR)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.