Vibrational Interventions for Sexual and Pelvic Health: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether scheduled vibrator use with an educational handout improves sexual and pelvic floor health for women with sexual dysfunction and pelvic floor disorders than the educational handout alone. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial conducted at a single-site tertiary referral center in the United States. Enrollment occurred from November 2024 to April 2025. Women aged at least 18 years with sexual dysfunction and a pelvic floor disorder diagnosis were included. Participants were randomized to receive either a vibrator approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration with scheduled use three times weekly for 8 weeks and an educational handout (vibrator group) or the educational handout, alone (handout group). The primary outcome was sexual function measured by the FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index). Secondary outcomes included results of the SSI (Sexual Satisfaction Index), PISQ-12 (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12), PFDI-20 (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20), F-GUPI (Female Genitourinary Pain Index), and PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9). RESULTS: Of 84 randomized participants, 81 completed the study (41 handout group, 40 vibrator group; 57.9±14.1 years). At 8 weeks, FSFI total scores were significantly higher in the vibrator group (22.2±7.5) than the handout group (16.3±8.7; P =.002), with improvements recorded across arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain domains (all P <.05). Although both groups improved from baseline, the vibrator group demonstrated greater mean FSFI improvement (8.8 points vs 4.9 points; mean difference, 4.0 points; P =.002). More participants in the vibrator group achieved normal FSFI total scores (higher than 26.5; 35.0% vs 12.2%; P =.02). CONCLUSION: For women with sexual dysfunction and pelvic floor disorders, scheduled vibrator use with an educational handout resulted in greater improvement in sexual function than an educational handout alone and may reduce urinary distress symptoms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov, NCT06677541.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006411
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Vibrational Interventions for Sexual and Pelvic Health: A Randomized Controlled Trial

K. Leong, Erin C Deverdis, Cara L. Grimes, Rebecca G. Rogers et al.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Vibrational Interventions for Sexual and Pelvic Health: A Randomized Controlled Trial

K. Leong, Erin C Deverdis, Cara L. Grimes, Rebecca G. Rogers, C. Carlton, Bradley E. Jacobs, Jeanne Ann Dahl, Brittany L. Roberts
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether scheduled vibrator use with an educational handout improves sexual and pelvic floor health for women with sexual dysfunction and pelvic floor disorders than the educational handout alone. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial conducted at a single-site tertiary referral center in the United States. Enrollment occurred from November 2024 to April 2025. Women aged at least 18 years with sexual dysfunction and a pelvic floor disorder diagnosis were included. Participants were randomized to receive either a vibrator approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration with scheduled use three times weekly for 8 weeks and an educational handout (vibrator group) or the educational handout, alone (handout group). The primary outcome was sexual function measured by the FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index). Secondary outcomes included results of the SSI (Sexual Satisfaction Index), PISQ-12 (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12), PFDI-20 (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20), F-GUPI (Female Genitourinary Pain Index), and PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9). RESULTS: Of 84 randomized participants, 81 completed the study (41 handout group, 40 vibrator group; 57.9±14.1 years). At 8 weeks, FSFI total scores were significantly higher in the vibrator group (22.2±7.5) than the handout group (16.3±8.7; P =.002), with improvements recorded across arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain domains (all P <.05). Although both groups improved from baseline, the vibrator group demonstrated greater mean FSFI improvement (8.8 points vs 4.9 points; mean difference, 4.0 points; P =.002). More participants in the vibrator group achieved normal FSFI total scores (higher than 26.5; 35.0% vs 12.2%; P =.02). CONCLUSION: For women with sexual dysfunction and pelvic floor disorders, scheduled vibrator use with an educational handout resulted in greater improvement in sexual function than an educational handout alone and may reduce urinary distress symptoms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov, NCT06677541.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.