89 Referral Patterns, Interventions and Outcomes: A 12 month Retrospective Review of Allied Health Professional Referrals from a Late Effects Clinic.

Abstract Introduction Access to specialist neurological rehabilitation is recommended at diagnosis of a brain tumour and throughout follow-up to optimise function, treatment tolerance and quality of life. At Guy’s Cancer Centre, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy (OT) and Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) are embedded within the neuro-oncology multidisciplinary team. Additionally, a Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) led late effects clinic was established to manage long term effects of diagnosis and treatment. This clinic does not have embedded Allied Health Professional (AHP) input; however, patients are increasingly referred to the AHP on-treat neuro-rehabilitation team with identified needs. We reviewed referrals from the late effects clinic to better understand rehabilitation complexity and inform future service development. Method A retrospective review of referrals from the late effects clinic between January and December 2025 was undertaken. Data collected included discipline, referral reason, intervention provided and onward referrals. Results A total of 30 referrals were received: 3 to all disciplines, 18 to both OT and Physiotherapy; 5 to Physiotherapy alone; and 7 to OT. Fatigue was the most common referral reason (n = 18), followed by cognition (n = 11), mobility/ falls (n = 9), sleep difficulties (n = 8), work-related challenges (n = 5), dysphagia (n = 1) and cognitive-communication concerns (n = 1). Of these, 4 patients declined assessment, and 2 were redirected to another service. Among patients seen, 10 received fatigue management support, 9 an exercise programme, and 6 received sleep hygiene intervention. Additionally, 2 patients were supported with concerns regarding work, 2 with cognitive difficulties and 2 given swallow support. Following assessment, 12 patients were referred to community services. Conclusions Patients attending a late effects clinic demonstrate complex rehabilitation needs. Further exploration of how best to provide timely access to appropriate AHP support within survivorship services is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noag172.030
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

89 Referral Patterns, Interventions and Outcomes: A 12 month Retrospective Review of Allied Health Professional Referrals from a Late Effects Clinic.

Grainne Kenny, Philippa MacDonnell, Paula Shukla, Agnieszka Kowalska et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

89 Referral Patterns, Interventions and Outcomes: A 12 month Retrospective Review of Allied Health Professional Referrals from a Late Effects Clinic.

Grainne Kenny, Philippa MacDonnell, Paula Shukla, Agnieszka Kowalska, Rebecca Clark
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Access to specialist neurological rehabilitation is recommended at diagnosis of a brain tumour and throughout follow-up to optimise function, treatment tolerance and quality of life. At Guy’s Cancer Centre, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy (OT) and Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) are embedded within the neuro-oncology multidisciplinary team. Additionally, a Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) led late effects clinic was established to manage long term effects of diagnosis and treatment. This clinic does not have embedded Allied Health Professional (AHP) input; however, patients are increasingly referred to the AHP on-treat neuro-rehabilitation team with identified needs. We reviewed referrals from the late effects clinic to better understand rehabilitation complexity and inform future service development. Method A retrospective review of referrals from the late effects clinic between January and December 2025 was undertaken. Data collected included discipline, referral reason, intervention provided and onward referrals. Results A total of 30 referrals were received: 3 to all disciplines, 18 to both OT and Physiotherapy; 5 to Physiotherapy alone; and 7 to OT. Fatigue was the most common referral reason (n = 18), followed by cognition (n = 11), mobility/ falls (n = 9), sleep difficulties (n = 8), work-related challenges (n = 5), dysphagia (n = 1) and cognitive-communication concerns (n = 1). Of these, 4 patients declined assessment, and 2 were redirected to another service. Among patients seen, 10 received fatigue management support, 9 an exercise programme, and 6 received sleep hygiene intervention. Additionally, 2 patients were supported with concerns regarding work, 2 with cognitive difficulties and 2 given swallow support. Following assessment, 12 patients were referred to community services. Conclusions Patients attending a late effects clinic demonstrate complex rehabilitation needs. Further exploration of how best to provide timely access to appropriate AHP support within survivorship services is warranted.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 28(Supplement_1)
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Thomas Foundation (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.