Atrial Fibrillation and HFrEF: Cause, Consequence, or Both?

Background/Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) frequently coexist and are linked by shared risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms. Their association is consistently related to worse clinical outcomes. This narrative review summarizes current evidence regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, management strategies, and prognosis of patients with AF and HFrEF. Methods: This is a narrative review based on published randomized trials, registries, and observational studies evaluating the interaction between AF and HFrEF, with a focus on therapeutic strategies including rate and rhythm control, catheter ablation, stroke prevention, and guideline-directed medical therapy. Results: AF and HFrEF have a bidirectional relationship, with each condition promoting the development and progression of the other. AF contributes to hemodynamic impairment and adverse remodeling, while HFrEF promotes atrial structural and electrical changes. Management remains complex. Rate control is commonly achieved with beta-blockers and digoxin, while rhythm control is limited by the safety profile of antiarrhythmic drugs. Catheter ablation has shown improvements in left ventricular function and, in selected patients, reductions in hospitalizations and mortality, although results are not consistent across all trials. Guideline-directed medical therapy improves outcomes in HFrEF, but its interaction with AF varies across drug classes. Stroke risk is significantly increased, requiring appropriate anticoagulation. Patients with AF and HFrEF have an increased risk of mortality, hospitalization, and adverse clinical events compared with those with either condition alone, although the extent to which these outcomes are attributable to AF itself, HF severity, or the associated comorbidity burden remains uncertain. Conclusions: The coexistence of AF and HFrEF identifies a high-risk population with complex management and unfavorable outcomes. While advances in rhythm control and heart failure therapies have improved selected outcomes, optimal treatment strategies and their impact on long-term prognosis remain incompletely defined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14091922
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Atrial Fibrillation and HFrEF: Cause, Consequence, or Both?

Andreea-Maria Grigore, Mihai Grigore, Ana-Maria Balahura, Camelia Nicolae et al.
Biomedicines
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Atrial Fibrillation and HFrEF: Cause, Consequence, or Both?

Andreea-Maria Grigore, Mihai Grigore, Ana-Maria Balahura, Camelia Nicolae, Adriana-Mihaela Ilieșiu, Verde Ioana, Ruxandra-Elena Martin-Graur, Uscoiu Gabriela
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) frequently coexist and are linked by shared risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms. Their association is consistently related to worse clinical outcomes. This narrative review summarizes current evidence regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, management strategies, and prognosis of patients with AF and HFrEF. Methods: This is a narrative review based on published randomized trials, registries, and observational studies evaluating the interaction between AF and HFrEF, with a focus on therapeutic strategies including rate and rhythm control, catheter ablation, stroke prevention, and guideline-directed medical therapy. Results: AF and HFrEF have a bidirectional relationship, with each condition promoting the development and progression of the other. AF contributes to hemodynamic impairment and adverse remodeling, while HFrEF promotes atrial structural and electrical changes. Management remains complex. Rate control is commonly achieved with beta-blockers and digoxin, while rhythm control is limited by the safety profile of antiarrhythmic drugs. Catheter ablation has shown improvements in left ventricular function and, in selected patients, reductions in hospitalizations and mortality, although results are not consistent across all trials. Guideline-directed medical therapy improves outcomes in HFrEF, but its interaction with AF varies across drug classes. Stroke risk is significantly increased, requiring appropriate anticoagulation. Patients with AF and HFrEF have an increased risk of mortality, hospitalization, and adverse clinical events compared with those with either condition alone, although the extent to which these outcomes are attributable to AF itself, HF severity, or the associated comorbidity burden remains uncertain. Conclusions: The coexistence of AF and HFrEF identifies a high-risk population with complex management and unfavorable outcomes. While advances in rhythm control and heart failure therapies have improved selected outcomes, optimal treatment strategies and their impact on long-term prognosis remain incompletely defined.

BiomedicinesVol. 14(9)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Spitalul Clinic Colentina (RO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.