Mobility as resilience: Non-standard workers in China under geopolitically induced supply-chain restructuring
Amid supply-chain restructuring triggered by US–China trade frictions, this study examines labour mobility among non-standard workers in China's export manufacturing sector. Drawing on four rounds of fieldwork undertaken between 2021 and 2024 as part of a longitudinal case study of rattan weavers at a leading Chinese manufacturer of outdoor leisure products, this study argues that weavers’ labour mobility is better understood not merely as an ad hoc response to employment precarity, but as a livelihood practice shaped by the interaction between buyer-driven global production regimes and China's labour regulatory framework premised on stable employment relationships, and organised through contractor-mediated networks. US–China trade frictions prompted global buyers to recalibrate governance arrangements in response to geopolitical risk, accelerating supply-chain restructuring. These changes intensified employment precarity and reconfigured weavers’ labour mobility from predominantly short-term and sector-bound circulation to more prolonged and differentiated forms of labour-market repositioning. Kinship- and locality-based ties supported this reconfiguration by enabling collective sense-making and facilitating access to alternative employment. The analysis develops a relational account of the translation of geopolitical pressures into workers’ employment experiences and livelihood practices, while theorising the reconfiguration of mobility strategies amid geopolitically induced supply-chain restructuring.
Authors
- Qiang Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7453-1638)
- Xiaoming Bao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1486-8305)
Institutions
- Henan University (CN)
- Nanjing University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Industrial Relations
- Published
- 2026-08-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856261481655
- Primary Topic
- Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences