RecoverAI 2030: An Explainable AI-Supported Project-Controls and Schedule-Recovery Framework for Saudi Infrastructure Programs

Large infrastructure programs generate schedule updates, progress records, procurement status, design approvals, requests for information, changes, resource data and risk registers. Project teams may detect delay only after negative float and milestone slippage have become difficult to recover. This paper proposes RecoverAI 2030, an explainable decision-support architecture that converts ten transparent project-control signals into a recovery-pressure tier while preserving the baseline, critical-path logic and professional judgment. The criteria cover critical-path erosion, negative float, progress variance, productivity deterioration, design and approval lag, procurement delay, interface pressure, resource overload, schedule-quality deficiency and change exposure. The artifact is computationally stress-tested using 96 reproducible synthetic monthly schedule snapshots generated with fixed seed 2033; no Primavera P6 file, employer, client or live-project record is used. Scores ranged from 4.6 to 91.7, with a mean of 44.7. The model assigned 34 snapshots to monitoring, 31 to focused recovery, 22 to integrated recovery and 9 to executive intervention. Median tier stability was 100% under 1,500 weight perturbations per snapshot, while the least stable boundary case retained its tier in 61.3% of trials. A controlled approval, procurement and resource-improvement scenario reduced recovery pressure by 7.0 points on average. Artificially suppressing critical-path erosion and schedule-quality gaps understated pressure by 7.6 points. An illustrative recovery simulation reduced modeled finish slippage by 10.1 days on average, but this is a mathematical scenario rather than observed performance. RecoverAI 2030 contributes an auditable triage and action architecture, not an autonomous scheduling system. Field calibration, prospective validation, schedule-quality gates, data governance and human authorization are required before deployment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22119902
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

RecoverAI 2030: An Explainable AI-Supported Project-Controls and Schedule-Recovery Framework for Saudi Infrastructure Programs

Qaisar Imtiaz Ali
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Construction Project Management and Performance
preprint

RecoverAI 2030: An Explainable AI-Supported Project-Controls and Schedule-Recovery Framework for Saudi Infrastructure Programs

Qaisar Imtiaz Ali
preprint en

Abstract

Large infrastructure programs generate schedule updates, progress records, procurement status, design approvals, requests for information, changes, resource data and risk registers. Project teams may detect delay only after negative float and milestone slippage have become difficult to recover. This paper proposes RecoverAI 2030, an explainable decision-support architecture that converts ten transparent project-control signals into a recovery-pressure tier while preserving the baseline, critical-path logic and professional judgment. The criteria cover critical-path erosion, negative float, progress variance, productivity deterioration, design and approval lag, procurement delay, interface pressure, resource overload, schedule-quality deficiency and change exposure. The artifact is computationally stress-tested using 96 reproducible synthetic monthly schedule snapshots generated with fixed seed 2033; no Primavera P6 file, employer, client or live-project record is used. Scores ranged from 4.6 to 91.7, with a mean of 44.7. The model assigned 34 snapshots to monitoring, 31 to focused recovery, 22 to integrated recovery and 9 to executive intervention. Median tier stability was 100% under 1,500 weight perturbations per snapshot, while the least stable boundary case retained its tier in 61.3% of trials. A controlled approval, procurement and resource-improvement scenario reduced recovery pressure by 7.0 points on average. Artificially suppressing critical-path erosion and schedule-quality gaps understated pressure by 7.6 points. An illustrative recovery simulation reduced modeled finish slippage by 10.1 days on average, but this is a mathematical scenario rather than observed performance. RecoverAI 2030 contributes an auditable triage and action architecture, not an autonomous scheduling system. Field calibration, prospective validation, schedule-quality gates, data governance and human authorization are required before deployment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

RecoverAI 2030: An Explainable AI-Supported Project-Controls and Schedule-Recovery Framework for Saudi Infrastructure Programs — Qaisar Imtiaz Ali · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS