Structural Racism in Healthcare: Nurses' Ethical and Professional Responsibility to Lead Structural Reform

BACKGROUND: Structural racism remains a pervasive and deeply embedded determinant of healthcare inequity globally. Despite strengthened professional standards and policy commitments to equity, racialised populations continue to experience substantial disparities in healthcare access, quality, safety and outcomes. These inequities are sustained not only through interpersonal encounters but also through structural conditions embedded within healthcare systems, workforce arrangements, governance processes and organisational cultures. Structural racism additionally affects nurses' wellbeing, workforce sustainability, psychological safety and professional progression, creating implications for both patient outcomes and healthcare system functioning. AIM: To articulate an evidence-informed position that addressing structural racism in healthcare is a moral, ethical and professional responsibility of nurses, and to propose a conceptual framework positioning nurses as leaders of structural reform, governance accountability and equity-driven healthcare transformation. DESIGN: Position paper drawing on interdisciplinary empirical evidence, ethical frameworks, workforce literature and contemporary nursing scholarship. DISCUSSION: This paper introduces the NSERF, which conceptualises structural racism as a multidimensional patient safety, workforce sustainability and governance accountability issue requiring coordinated nurse-led structural advocacy and institutional reform. Structural racism is shown to operate through interconnected systems including healthcare policy, workforce structures, organisational governance, clinical practice and professional hierarchies, contributing to inequitable access to care, workforce exclusion, reduced psychological safety, burnout and poorer health outcomes. While nursing advocacy has historically focused on individual patient protection, this paper argues that structural advocacy is necessary to address systemic inequities embedded within institutional systems. Strategic reform directions include governance accountability, equity-integrated clinical governance, workforce equity, structural competency education and policy engagement. CONCLUSION: Structural racism compromises healthcare equity, patient safety, workforce sustainability and organisational trust. Nurses possess an ethical mandate, professional authority and practice-informed insight to lead structural reform. Moving beyond interpersonal advocacy towards sustained structural advocacy is essential for developing equitable, culturally safe, accountable and sustainable healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Open
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70754
Primary Topic
Cultural Competency in Health Care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural Racism in Healthcare: Nurses' Ethical and Professional Responsibility to Lead Structural Reform

Chanchal Kurup, Deepa Rijal
Nursing Open
Cultural Competency in Health Care
article

Structural Racism in Healthcare: Nurses' Ethical and Professional Responsibility to Lead Structural Reform

Chanchal Kurup, Deepa Rijal
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Structural racism remains a pervasive and deeply embedded determinant of healthcare inequity globally. Despite strengthened professional standards and policy commitments to equity, racialised populations continue to experience substantial disparities in healthcare access, quality, safety and outcomes. These inequities are sustained not only through interpersonal encounters but also through structural conditions embedded within healthcare systems, workforce arrangements, governance processes and organisational cultures. Structural racism additionally affects nurses' wellbeing, workforce sustainability, psychological safety and professional progression, creating implications for both patient outcomes and healthcare system functioning. AIM: To articulate an evidence-informed position that addressing structural racism in healthcare is a moral, ethical and professional responsibility of nurses, and to propose a conceptual framework positioning nurses as leaders of structural reform, governance accountability and equity-driven healthcare transformation. DESIGN: Position paper drawing on interdisciplinary empirical evidence, ethical frameworks, workforce literature and contemporary nursing scholarship. DISCUSSION: This paper introduces the NSERF, which conceptualises structural racism as a multidimensional patient safety, workforce sustainability and governance accountability issue requiring coordinated nurse-led structural advocacy and institutional reform. Structural racism is shown to operate through interconnected systems including healthcare policy, workforce structures, organisational governance, clinical practice and professional hierarchies, contributing to inequitable access to care, workforce exclusion, reduced psychological safety, burnout and poorer health outcomes. While nursing advocacy has historically focused on individual patient protection, this paper argues that structural advocacy is necessary to address systemic inequities embedded within institutional systems. Strategic reform directions include governance accountability, equity-integrated clinical governance, workforce equity, structural competency education and policy engagement. CONCLUSION: Structural racism compromises healthcare equity, patient safety, workforce sustainability and organisational trust. Nurses possess an ethical mandate, professional authority and practice-informed insight to lead structural reform. Moving beyond interpersonal advocacy towards sustained structural advocacy is essential for developing equitable, culturally safe, accountable and sustainable healthcare systems.

Nursing OpenVol. 13(9)
Royal Botanic Garden Sydney (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cultural Competency in Health Care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.