Machine learning-based screening model for osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women: a nationwide study with prospective fracture validation

This study develops a machine learning model to predict osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women. The model was trained using the largest nationwide cohort and externally validated. It showed AUCs of 0.744-0.798 and demonstrated prognostic value for 5-year fracture risk, supporting population-level screening where DXA resources are limited. PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is highly prevalent among Chinese postmenopausal women, yet underdiagnosis remains due to limited DXA availability. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based model for osteoporosis prediction using easily obtainable variables. METHODS: The model was trained using data from the largest nationwide cohort (China Osteoporosis Prevalence Study, n = 6,574) and externally validated in two independent cohorts: the China Vertebral and Osteoporosis Study (n = 1,758) and the Peking Vertebral Fracture Study baseline (n = 1,439). Five predictors selected via LASSO regression were used to train the prediction model. Model performance was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plot. To evaluate its ability to predict future fractures, the model was evaluated in a 5-year follow-up cohort (n = 795). A web-based calculator was developed for public use. RESULTS: The model showed strong discrimination (AUC: 0.798 in the training cohort; 0.775 in the internal validation cohort; 0.750 and 0.744 in the external validation cohorts) and good calibration across all cohorts. A rule-out threshold (≥ 0.098) demonstrated high sensitivity (94.7%, 89.3%) and negative predictive value (91.3%, 92.7%) in two external cohorts. The model also demonstrated prognostic value for fracture risk stratification. In the 5-year follow-up, individuals classified as high risk had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of clinical fractures (HR 1.78; 95% CI, 1.06-2.99; P = 0.026), as well as higher rates of all fractures (15.9% vs. 9.5%; P = 0.015) and non-traumatic fractures (7.8% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: This model demonstrated good performance in predicting osteoporosis among Chinese postmenopausal women and may facilitate two-step screening strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Osteoporosis International
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-026-08185-1
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning-based screening model for osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women: a nationwide study with prospective fracture validation

Weibo Xia, Qichao Sun, Xiaolan Jin, Linhong Wang et al.
Osteoporosis International
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Machine learning-based screening model for osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women: a nationwide study with prospective fracture validation

Weibo Xia, Qichao Sun, Xiaolan Jin, Linhong Wang, Zhongjian Xie, Shunyu Tang, Lin Chen, Zhixin Li, Wei Yu, Lijia Cui, Xiangjun Yin, Lu Cui, Nan Zhao, Hua Lin, Steven R. Cummings
article en

Abstract

This study develops a machine learning model to predict osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women. The model was trained using the largest nationwide cohort and externally validated. It showed AUCs of 0.744-0.798 and demonstrated prognostic value for 5-year fracture risk, supporting population-level screening where DXA resources are limited. PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is highly prevalent among Chinese postmenopausal women, yet underdiagnosis remains due to limited DXA availability. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based model for osteoporosis prediction using easily obtainable variables. METHODS: The model was trained using data from the largest nationwide cohort (China Osteoporosis Prevalence Study, n = 6,574) and externally validated in two independent cohorts: the China Vertebral and Osteoporosis Study (n = 1,758) and the Peking Vertebral Fracture Study baseline (n = 1,439). Five predictors selected via LASSO regression were used to train the prediction model. Model performance was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plot. To evaluate its ability to predict future fractures, the model was evaluated in a 5-year follow-up cohort (n = 795). A web-based calculator was developed for public use. RESULTS: The model showed strong discrimination (AUC: 0.798 in the training cohort; 0.775 in the internal validation cohort; 0.750 and 0.744 in the external validation cohorts) and good calibration across all cohorts. A rule-out threshold (≥ 0.098) demonstrated high sensitivity (94.7%, 89.3%) and negative predictive value (91.3%, 92.7%) in two external cohorts. The model also demonstrated prognostic value for fracture risk stratification. In the 5-year follow-up, individuals classified as high risk had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of clinical fractures (HR 1.78; 95% CI, 1.06-2.99; P = 0.026), as well as higher rates of all fractures (15.9% vs. 9.5%; P = 0.015) and non-traumatic fractures (7.8% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: This model demonstrated good performance in predicting osteoporosis among Chinese postmenopausal women and may facilitate two-step screening strategies.

Osteoporosis International
Central South University (CN), Army Medical University (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), California Pacific Medical Center (US), Daping Hospital (CN), Chengdu Military General Hospital (CN), Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (CN), National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention (CN), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.