A longer time interval between operative hysteroscopy and intrauterine insemination is negatively associated with pregnancy outcomes

Intrauterine pathology can create an unfavourable environment for pregnancy. We therefore sought to determine optimal time interval between operative hysteroscopy and intrauterine insemination (IUI) to optimise pregnancy outcomes. This study was a retrospective cohort study of IUI cycles following an operative hysteroscopy performed at our institution between January 2018 and August 2023. Our primary outcome was clinical pregnancy following IUI. Patients were grouped into one of four cohorts based on the number of days between operative hysteroscopy and subsequent IUI. We compared cohorts by estimating risk ratios using modified Poisson regression models, adjusting for female age, subfertility diagnosis, and number of prior IUI cycles and utilised P values. We identified 896 patients undergoing a total of 917 IUI cycles following an operative hysteroscopy in whom clinical pregnancy occurred in 16.4% of all IUI cycles. After adjustment, a longer interval between operative hysteroscopy and IUI was associated with a lower probability of a clinical pregnancy. In a subgroup analysis of 728 hysteroscopic polypectomies, the clinical pregnancy rate following IUI was similar to that for all operative hysteroscopies (16.3% v 16.4%, respectively). In conclusion, delaying IUI after hysteroscopy is not needed to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Fertility
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2026.2722366
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A longer time interval between operative hysteroscopy and intrauterine insemination is negatively associated with pregnancy outcomes

David Boedeker, Ava Dimmick, Kerry Flannagan, Kiley Hunkler et al.
Human Fertility
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

A longer time interval between operative hysteroscopy and intrauterine insemination is negatively associated with pregnancy outcomes

David Boedeker, Ava Dimmick, Kerry Flannagan, Kiley Hunkler, Phillip Romanski, Trimble Spitzer, Dominique Zarrella, Meghan Yamasaki
article en

Abstract

Intrauterine pathology can create an unfavourable environment for pregnancy. We therefore sought to determine optimal time interval between operative hysteroscopy and intrauterine insemination (IUI) to optimise pregnancy outcomes. This study was a retrospective cohort study of IUI cycles following an operative hysteroscopy performed at our institution between January 2018 and August 2023. Our primary outcome was clinical pregnancy following IUI. Patients were grouped into one of four cohorts based on the number of days between operative hysteroscopy and subsequent IUI. We compared cohorts by estimating risk ratios using modified Poisson regression models, adjusting for female age, subfertility diagnosis, and number of prior IUI cycles and utilised P values. We identified 896 patients undergoing a total of 917 IUI cycles following an operative hysteroscopy in whom clinical pregnancy occurred in 16.4% of all IUI cycles. After adjustment, a longer interval between operative hysteroscopy and IUI was associated with a lower probability of a clinical pregnancy. In a subgroup analysis of 728 hysteroscopic polypectomies, the clinical pregnancy rate following IUI was similar to that for all operative hysteroscopies (16.3% v 16.4%, respectively). In conclusion, delaying IUI after hysteroscopy is not needed to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Human FertilityVol. 29(1)
Unifor (NO), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US), Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York (US), Shady Grove Fertility Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.