53 Analysis of translational challenges across 19 brain tumour therapeutic development programmes: Insights from the BTR-NTA accelerator

Abstract Introduction Development of novel therapies for brain tumours faces high attrition rates, with few programmes reaching approval. This thematic analysis synthesises translational challenges identified through the Brain Tumour Research Novel Therapeutics Accelerator (BTR-NTA), an international multidisciplinary programme providing structured expert guidance to accelerate novel brain tumour treatments toward clinical application. Methods Between 2023 and 2025, BTR-NTA received 33 applications from academic and industry groups developing novel brain tumour therapies. Nineteen programmes were selected based on scientific merit and clinical potential and received up to 240 hours of multidisciplinary input across preclinical, clinical, regulatory, commercialisation, and patient advocacy domains. A structured analysis of feedback reports from 19 programmes was conducted to identify recurring translational challenges. Themes were stratified by applicant type, development stage and modality. Results Analysis identified five recurring translational challenges: (1) all programmes required guidance on defining data packages to support milestone decisions (e.g., IND-enabling studies, go/no-go criteria); (2) 95% had insufficient CNS penetration or tumour-site distribution data from clinically relevant disease models; (3) all programmes needed guidance on timing and scope of regulatory engagement; (4) 79% lacked manufacturing readiness despite scientific maturity; and (5) 53% required support developing patient and public involvement strategies. Six of 11 eligible programmes (55%) completed a one-year follow-up survey. All respondents had adapted their development strategy based on BTR-NTA guidance and secured follow-on funding from governmental, charitable, or venture capital sources. Conclusions There appear to be systemic translational challenges that risk delaying progression into the clinic of potential therapies built on robust scientific data. Earlier expert guidance may accelerate therapy development and improve success rates. Wider dissemination of these insights may support improvement in translational pathways across the brain tumour therapeutic development landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noag172.086
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

53 Analysis of translational challenges across 19 brain tumour therapeutic development programmes: Insights from the BTR-NTA accelerator

Nicky Huskens, Petra Hamerlik, Juanita Lopez, Paul Brennan et al.
Neuro-Oncology
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

53 Analysis of translational challenges across 19 brain tumour therapeutic development programmes: Insights from the BTR-NTA accelerator

Nicky Huskens, Petra Hamerlik, Juanita Lopez, Paul Brennan, Katie Bushby, Eloise Lines, Darren Hargrave, Erik Sulman, Ruman Rahman, Dione Kobayashi, Helen Bulbeck, Kanneboyina Nagaraju, Ryan Mathew, Edward Kaye, Javad Nazarian, Kate Munro, Artie Romero, Karen Noble
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Development of novel therapies for brain tumours faces high attrition rates, with few programmes reaching approval. This thematic analysis synthesises translational challenges identified through the Brain Tumour Research Novel Therapeutics Accelerator (BTR-NTA), an international multidisciplinary programme providing structured expert guidance to accelerate novel brain tumour treatments toward clinical application. Methods Between 2023 and 2025, BTR-NTA received 33 applications from academic and industry groups developing novel brain tumour therapies. Nineteen programmes were selected based on scientific merit and clinical potential and received up to 240 hours of multidisciplinary input across preclinical, clinical, regulatory, commercialisation, and patient advocacy domains. A structured analysis of feedback reports from 19 programmes was conducted to identify recurring translational challenges. Themes were stratified by applicant type, development stage and modality. Results Analysis identified five recurring translational challenges: (1) all programmes required guidance on defining data packages to support milestone decisions (e.g., IND-enabling studies, go/no-go criteria); (2) 95% had insufficient CNS penetration or tumour-site distribution data from clinically relevant disease models; (3) all programmes needed guidance on timing and scope of regulatory engagement; (4) 79% lacked manufacturing readiness despite scientific maturity; and (5) 53% required support developing patient and public involvement strategies. Six of 11 eligible programmes (55%) completed a one-year follow-up survey. All respondents had adapted their development strategy based on BTR-NTA guidance and secured follow-on funding from governmental, charitable, or venture capital sources. Conclusions There appear to be systemic translational challenges that risk delaying progression into the clinic of potential therapies built on robust scientific data. Earlier expert guidance may accelerate therapy development and improve success rates. Wider dissemination of these insights may support improvement in translational pathways across the brain tumour therapeutic development landscape.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 28(Supplement_1)
Binghamton University (US), Universidad de Deusto (ES), University of Nottingham (GB), Duke University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), Brain Tumour Charity (GB), University of Manchester (GB), London Cancer (GB), Institute of Cancer Research (CA), Brain Tumour Research (GB), University Children's Hospital Zurich (CH), University College London (GB), Mass General Brigham (US), Aurora University (US), Manchester University (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.