Inhaled Corticosteroid Escalation After a Single Moderate Exacerbation in COPD : Differential Benefit by Exacerbation Subtype

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), evidence supporting escalation to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing therapy after single moderate exacerbation in patients receiving dual bronchodilator therapy remains inconsistent. We aimed to evaluate whether the clinical benefit of ICS escalation differs according to the treatment phenotype of moderate exacerbations. METHODS: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we identified ICS-naïve patients with COPD initiating long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) therapy. Sequential target trial emulations were conducted among patients who experienced one moderate exacerbation while on LAMA/LABA. Exacerbations were classified as antibiotic-treated (without systemic corticosteroids) or systemic corticosteroid-treated (with or without antibiotics). Outcomes were compared between ICS escalation and LAMA/LABA continuation groups using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Among 94,938 patients who initiated LAMA/LABA therapy, treatment persistence remained high, with over 60% maintaining dual therapy at 6 years, despite a marked decline in exacerbation-free survival. In matched analyses, ICS escalation after single antibiotic-treated exacerbations was not associated with reduced subsequent exacerbation risk. In contrast, among patients with steroid-treated moderate exacerbations, continuation of LAMA/LABA was associated with a higher risk of exacerbations (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.23), compared with escalation to ICS-containing therapy. Findings were consistent across subgroups defined by exacerbation history. CONCLUSION: In this large real-world COPD cohort, the benefit of ICS escalation after single moderate exacerbation varied by exacerbation treatment phenotype. Steroid-treated events were associated with a reduced subsequent exacerbation with ICS escalation, whereas antibiotic-treated events did not confer additional benefit from ICS, supporting a more precise approach to ICS escalation beyond exacerbation frequency alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respirology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/resp.70300
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Inhaled Corticosteroid Escalation After a Single Moderate Exacerbation in COPD : Differential Benefit by Exacerbation Subtype

Sun Hye Shin, Danbee Kang, Jihye Heo, Juhee Cho et al.
Respirology
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Inhaled Corticosteroid Escalation After a Single Moderate Exacerbation in COPD : Differential Benefit by Exacerbation Subtype

Sun Hye Shin, Danbee Kang, Jihye Heo, Juhee Cho, Ji Ye Jung, Hye Yun Park, Dave Singh
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), evidence supporting escalation to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing therapy after single moderate exacerbation in patients receiving dual bronchodilator therapy remains inconsistent. We aimed to evaluate whether the clinical benefit of ICS escalation differs according to the treatment phenotype of moderate exacerbations. METHODS: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we identified ICS-naïve patients with COPD initiating long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) therapy. Sequential target trial emulations were conducted among patients who experienced one moderate exacerbation while on LAMA/LABA. Exacerbations were classified as antibiotic-treated (without systemic corticosteroids) or systemic corticosteroid-treated (with or without antibiotics). Outcomes were compared between ICS escalation and LAMA/LABA continuation groups using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Among 94,938 patients who initiated LAMA/LABA therapy, treatment persistence remained high, with over 60% maintaining dual therapy at 6 years, despite a marked decline in exacerbation-free survival. In matched analyses, ICS escalation after single antibiotic-treated exacerbations was not associated with reduced subsequent exacerbation risk. In contrast, among patients with steroid-treated moderate exacerbations, continuation of LAMA/LABA was associated with a higher risk of exacerbations (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.23), compared with escalation to ICS-containing therapy. Findings were consistent across subgroups defined by exacerbation history. CONCLUSION: In this large real-world COPD cohort, the benefit of ICS escalation after single moderate exacerbation varied by exacerbation treatment phenotype. Steroid-treated events were associated with a reduced subsequent exacerbation with ICS escalation, whereas antibiotic-treated events did not confer additional benefit from ICS, supporting a more precise approach to ICS escalation beyond exacerbation frequency alone.

Respirology
Severance Hospital (KR), Samsung Medical Center (KR), IQVIA (United Kingdom) (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Gangnam Severance Hospital (KR), Medicines Evaluation Unit (GB), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.