Prognostic Determinants of Overall Survival After Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Consensus‐Based Conceptual Framework

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carries a dismal prognosis despite surgical resection, yet the prognostic literature remains fragmented across hundreds of single-institution studies that vary in design, covariates, and analytical approaches. A synthesis of this evidence is needed to identify which factors most consistently predict overall survival (OS) after curative-intent resection and standardize covariate selection for future outcomes research and trial design. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL (1990-2023) for studies reporting on factors associated with OS following curative-intent resection for PDAC. Prognostic variables from multivariable analyses were extracted and categorized into six conceptual domains: demographics and socioeconomic factors, clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, molecular biomarkers, tumor characteristics, and treatment-related factors. Strength of agreement across studies was classified as consensus (≥ 75% concordance), fair (> 50%-74%), or weak/none (≤ 50%). The protocol was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021278699). Of 49 867 identified records, 947 studies encompassing 1 430 411 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 650 prognostic factors were tested with OS across the literature; 58 were incorporated into the conceptual framework. Among tumor characteristics, pathological nodal status (pN; 82.1%, consensus) and tumor grade (75.0%, consensus) were the strongest and most consistent negative predictors of OS. Margin status, perineural invasion, and lymph node ratio reached fair-level negative agreement. Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was the most robust positive predictor (80.4%, consensus), followed by treatment at an academic medical center (75.0%, consensus). Socioeconomic determinants-including private insurance and higher income-demonstrated consensus-level positive associations with OS. Most comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and preoperative clinical characteristics showed fair-to-no association with OS in multivariable analyses. Tumor biology and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy are the most consistent determinants of OS post-PDAC resection. Socioeconomic and structural factors carry consistent prognostic weight and warrant routine inclusion in survival models. Our findings provide a framework for future prognostic modeling, clinical decision-making, and trial design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70362
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Determinants of Overall Survival After Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Consensus‐Based Conceptual Framework

Kaleem S. Ahmed, Clayton Thomas Marcinak, Noorain Ahmad, Hareem Khalid et al.
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Prognostic Determinants of Overall Survival After Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Consensus‐Based Conceptual Framework

Kaleem S. Ahmed, Clayton Thomas Marcinak, Noorain Ahmad, Hareem Khalid, Anne L. Ersig, Muhammad Maisam Ali, Syed Ali Tayyeb Hasan, Syed Nabeel Zafar, Kainat Fatima
article en

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carries a dismal prognosis despite surgical resection, yet the prognostic literature remains fragmented across hundreds of single-institution studies that vary in design, covariates, and analytical approaches. A synthesis of this evidence is needed to identify which factors most consistently predict overall survival (OS) after curative-intent resection and standardize covariate selection for future outcomes research and trial design. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL (1990-2023) for studies reporting on factors associated with OS following curative-intent resection for PDAC. Prognostic variables from multivariable analyses were extracted and categorized into six conceptual domains: demographics and socioeconomic factors, clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, molecular biomarkers, tumor characteristics, and treatment-related factors. Strength of agreement across studies was classified as consensus (≥ 75% concordance), fair (> 50%-74%), or weak/none (≤ 50%). The protocol was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021278699). Of 49 867 identified records, 947 studies encompassing 1 430 411 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 650 prognostic factors were tested with OS across the literature; 58 were incorporated into the conceptual framework. Among tumor characteristics, pathological nodal status (pN; 82.1%, consensus) and tumor grade (75.0%, consensus) were the strongest and most consistent negative predictors of OS. Margin status, perineural invasion, and lymph node ratio reached fair-level negative agreement. Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was the most robust positive predictor (80.4%, consensus), followed by treatment at an academic medical center (75.0%, consensus). Socioeconomic determinants-including private insurance and higher income-demonstrated consensus-level positive associations with OS. Most comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and preoperative clinical characteristics showed fair-to-no association with OS in multivariable analyses. Tumor biology and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy are the most consistent determinants of OS post-PDAC resection. Socioeconomic and structural factors carry consistent prognostic weight and warrant routine inclusion in survival models. Our findings provide a framework for future prognostic modeling, clinical decision-making, and trial design.

Journal of Surgical Oncology
Aga Khan University (PK), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.