How Should AI Agents Ask for Donations? Comparison of Emotional and Normative Appeals in AI-Mediated Fundraising

AI chatbots are increasingly being used by charities to engage potential donors. However, as people may exhibit algorithm aversion and heightened scrutiny toward AI, it remains unclear whether persuasive strategies established in human fundraising operate similarly when delivered by an AI agent. In a between-subjects experiment (N=206), participants interacted with a charity AI agent that applied either an emotional appeal (messages evoking compassion and empathy) or a normative appeal (messages emphasizing that many others donate) for fundraising purposes. Results show that emotional appeals significantly enhanced donation intentions by inducing empathy. Normative appeals, however, reduced message believability, which subsequently weakened anticipatory guilt and ultimately lowered donation intentions. These findings identify message believability as a critical boundary condition for AI-delivered normative appeals and highlight the need for design approaches that carefully calibrate how AI agents employ different message strategies when soliciting donations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2719117
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Should AI Agents Ask for Donations? Comparison of Emotional and Normative Appeals in AI-Mediated Fundraising

Yanyun Wang, Yuan Sun
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
AI in Service Interactions
article

How Should AI Agents Ask for Donations? Comparison of Emotional and Normative Appeals in AI-Mediated Fundraising

Yanyun Wang, Yuan Sun
article en

Abstract

AI chatbots are increasingly being used by charities to engage potential donors. However, as people may exhibit algorithm aversion and heightened scrutiny toward AI, it remains unclear whether persuasive strategies established in human fundraising operate similarly when delivered by an AI agent. In a between-subjects experiment (N=206), participants interacted with a charity AI agent that applied either an emotional appeal (messages evoking compassion and empathy) or a normative appeal (messages emphasizing that many others donate) for fundraising purposes. Results show that emotional appeals significantly enhanced donation intentions by inducing empathy. Normative appeals, however, reduced message believability, which subsequently weakened anticipatory guilt and ultimately lowered donation intentions. These findings identify message believability as a critical boundary condition for AI-delivered normative appeals and highlight the need for design approaches that carefully calibrate how AI agents employ different message strategies when soliciting donations.

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
School of Advertising Art (US), University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.