39 Barriers to participation in research: the experience of people with brain tumours

Abstract Introduction Brain tumours remain the biggest cancer killer of people under 40, with minimal survival improvements over recent decades. Despite the critical role of research in advancing understanding, improving treatments and ultimately, patient outcomes, many people diagnosed with brain tumours experience significant barriers to participating in research activities such as clinical trials or tissue donation. This report explores the systemic and patient-centred barriers that hinder research participation for people affected by brain tumours in England. Methods The barriers to research participation were identified through a rapid review of existing literature, focus groups with patients, family members, and carers, and semi-structured interviews with clinicians, researchers and key stakeholders. Qualitative data were thematically analysed to identify prominent structural and patient level barriers to research participation. Results At the system level, limited availability of brain tumour trials, geographic inequities, fragmented referral pathways, and insufficient research infrastructure constrained participation. Workforce pressures and lack of protected research time further limited clinician engagement. At Trust level, inconsistencies in tissue collection, biobanking practices, and data sharing reduced research capacity. At the patient level, cognitive side effects, limited awareness of research opportunities, and complex consent processes limited enrolment into trials. Communication gaps between care teams and patients, combined with the emotional burden at diagnosis, further reduced recruitment. Collectively, these factors contribute to some of the lowest clinical trial participation rates among cancer populations. Conclusions The report argues that overcoming these barriers requires coordinated national action, including dedicated policy change, targeted investment, standardised research processes, and improved patient communication and support. The key recommendations focus on strengthening research registries, standardising tissue banking, making reasonable adjustments to the consent process, and embedding research within routine clinical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noag172.078
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

39 Barriers to participation in research: the experience of people with brain tumours

Marcus Cahill-Evans, Clair Thorstensen-Woll
Neuro-Oncology
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

39 Barriers to participation in research: the experience of people with brain tumours

Marcus Cahill-Evans, Clair Thorstensen-Woll
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Brain tumours remain the biggest cancer killer of people under 40, with minimal survival improvements over recent decades. Despite the critical role of research in advancing understanding, improving treatments and ultimately, patient outcomes, many people diagnosed with brain tumours experience significant barriers to participating in research activities such as clinical trials or tissue donation. This report explores the systemic and patient-centred barriers that hinder research participation for people affected by brain tumours in England. Methods The barriers to research participation were identified through a rapid review of existing literature, focus groups with patients, family members, and carers, and semi-structured interviews with clinicians, researchers and key stakeholders. Qualitative data were thematically analysed to identify prominent structural and patient level barriers to research participation. Results At the system level, limited availability of brain tumour trials, geographic inequities, fragmented referral pathways, and insufficient research infrastructure constrained participation. Workforce pressures and lack of protected research time further limited clinician engagement. At Trust level, inconsistencies in tissue collection, biobanking practices, and data sharing reduced research capacity. At the patient level, cognitive side effects, limited awareness of research opportunities, and complex consent processes limited enrolment into trials. Communication gaps between care teams and patients, combined with the emotional burden at diagnosis, further reduced recruitment. Collectively, these factors contribute to some of the lowest clinical trial participation rates among cancer populations. Conclusions The report argues that overcoming these barriers requires coordinated national action, including dedicated policy change, targeted investment, standardised research processes, and improved patient communication and support. The key recommendations focus on strengthening research registries, standardising tissue banking, making reasonable adjustments to the consent process, and embedding research within routine clinical care.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 28(Supplement_1)
Brain Tumour Charity (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

39 Barriers to participation in research: the experience of people with brain tumours — Marcus Cahill-Evans, Clair Thorstensen-Woll · Neuro-Oncology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS