The Politics of History and the History of Politics: Gender, Power, and Resistance in Mary Shelley's Valperga

Abstract Mary Shelley’s Valperga: or, The Life and Adventures of Castruccio, Prince of Lucca (1823) is a significant work of Romantic historical fiction that transforms medieval Italian political history into a complex examination of power, gender, violence, liberty, and resistance. Although the novel takes its title and ostensible subject from Castruccio Castracani, the historical prince of Lucca, its ethical and ideological centre gradually shifts toward Euthanasia, Countess of Valperga, a fictional woman ruler whose political principles challenge the masculine logic of conquest represented by Castruccio. Set against the wars between the Guelphs and Ghibellines, the novel does not simply reconstruct the past; it interrogates the processes through which political authority becomes historical memory. This paper argues that Valperga creates a counter-history of political power by placing Castruccio’s history of conquest, sovereignty, and military ambition against Euthanasia’s alternative history of liberty, moral responsibility, sympathy, and resistance. Drawing upon Michel Foucault’s concepts of power, knowledge, and resistance; Hannah Arendt’s distinction between power and violence; Hayden White’s theory of historical representation; Joan Wallach Scott’s understanding of gender as a category of historical analysis; and Mary Wollstonecraft’s arguments concerning female rationality and autonomy, the paper examines Shelley’s critique of masculine political authority and patriarchal historiography. Euthanasia and Beatrice, although fictional and therefore absent from conventional historical records, become central to Shelley’s reconstruction of the moral meaning of history. The novel ultimately challenges the assumption that political victory constitutes historical or ethical legitimacy and suggests that the history of power must also include the experiences of those who resist, suffer under, and are excluded by it. Keywords: historical fiction, gender, power, resistance, historiography, Euthanasia, political violence

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22126227
Primary Topic
Literature: history, themes, analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of History and the History of Politics: Gender, Power, and Resistance in Mary Shelley's Valperga

Rachana Sharma, Ashish Visein
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Literature: history, themes, analysis
article

The Politics of History and the History of Politics: Gender, Power, and Resistance in Mary Shelley's Valperga

Rachana Sharma, Ashish Visein
article en

Abstract

Abstract Mary Shelley’s Valperga: or, The Life and Adventures of Castruccio, Prince of Lucca (1823) is a significant work of Romantic historical fiction that transforms medieval Italian political history into a complex examination of power, gender, violence, liberty, and resistance. Although the novel takes its title and ostensible subject from Castruccio Castracani, the historical prince of Lucca, its ethical and ideological centre gradually shifts toward Euthanasia, Countess of Valperga, a fictional woman ruler whose political principles challenge the masculine logic of conquest represented by Castruccio. Set against the wars between the Guelphs and Ghibellines, the novel does not simply reconstruct the past; it interrogates the processes through which political authority becomes historical memory. This paper argues that Valperga creates a counter-history of political power by placing Castruccio’s history of conquest, sovereignty, and military ambition against Euthanasia’s alternative history of liberty, moral responsibility, sympathy, and resistance. Drawing upon Michel Foucault’s concepts of power, knowledge, and resistance; Hannah Arendt’s distinction between power and violence; Hayden White’s theory of historical representation; Joan Wallach Scott’s understanding of gender as a category of historical analysis; and Mary Wollstonecraft’s arguments concerning female rationality and autonomy, the paper examines Shelley’s critique of masculine political authority and patriarchal historiography. Euthanasia and Beatrice, although fictional and therefore absent from conventional historical records, become central to Shelley’s reconstruction of the moral meaning of history. The novel ultimately challenges the assumption that political victory constitutes historical or ethical legitimacy and suggests that the history of power must also include the experiences of those who resist, suffer under, and are excluded by it. Keywords: historical fiction, gender, power, resistance, historiography, Euthanasia, political violence

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mother Hospital (IN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Literature: history, themes, analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Politics of History and the History of Politics: Gender, Power, and Resistance in Mary Shelley's Valperga — Rachana Sharma, Ashish Visein · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS