The Ethics of Bodyoid Use

This paper argues that there may not be a decisive moral reason to prohibit the use of bodyoids for research, clinical education, or organ procurement, provided that such entities can be ethically and feasibly created. The first part of the paper argues that, even if one grants that bodyoids have moral status, that fact alone may be insufficient to show that their use is impermissible, because bodyoids are plausibly not the kinds of beings that can be harmed in a morally relevant sense. The second part argues that, even if the use of bodyoids could have deleterious effects on the character of some who use them, those effects may not, by themselves, be sufficient to justify prohibition, since regulatory, institutional, and psychological safeguards could help mitigate their potential downstream effects on conduct. The final part argues that, on balance, there may be substantial reasons to use bodyoids for these purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Anatomy
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70209
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ethics of Bodyoid Use

L. Fine, Christopher F. Masciari
Clinical Anatomy
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

The Ethics of Bodyoid Use

L. Fine, Christopher F. Masciari
article en

Abstract

This paper argues that there may not be a decisive moral reason to prohibit the use of bodyoids for research, clinical education, or organ procurement, provided that such entities can be ethically and feasibly created. The first part of the paper argues that, even if one grants that bodyoids have moral status, that fact alone may be insufficient to show that their use is impermissible, because bodyoids are plausibly not the kinds of beings that can be harmed in a morally relevant sense. The second part argues that, even if the use of bodyoids could have deleterious effects on the character of some who use them, those effects may not, by themselves, be sufficient to justify prohibition, since regulatory, institutional, and psychological safeguards could help mitigate their potential downstream effects on conduct. The final part argues that, on balance, there may be substantial reasons to use bodyoids for these purposes.

Clinical Anatomy
Community Health Network (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.