Digital Patient-Reported Monitoring of Functional Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With or Without Perioperative Hormonal Therapy

Background/Objectives: Perioperative androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) are increasingly used in high-risk prostate cancer, yet patient-centred functional-recovery data after radical prostatectomy are scarce and rarely standardized. We assessed whether a smartphone-based digital monitoring pathway could characterize social-continence recovery and capture differences associated with a perioperative hormonal therapy (PHT) strategy after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph-node dissection (RARP + LND). Methods: In a two-centre consecutive cohort (n = 98) of men with high-risk, non-metastatic prostate cancer aligned with SUGAR and PROTEUS criteria, we compared upfront surgery (standard of care [SOC], n = 72) with a planned PHT strategy (ADT or ARPI, n = 26); all patients were urinary-continent preoperatively. Clinical data were prospective; patient-reported and patient-experience measures were captured through a routine-care digital platform (Betty Coaching application) delivering an identical prehabilitation/rehabilitation pathway to both groups, with pre- and postoperative pelvic-floor muscle training performed by all patients. The primary endpoint was 6-month social continence (0–1 pad/day), assessed by clinician and patient reports as co-primary sources. Differences are reported as risk differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: At 6 weeks, no statistically clear difference was observed (clinician 66.2% vs. 56.5%; risk difference 9.7 percentage points, 95% CI −12 to 32). At 6 months, social continence was lower with PHT (clinician 87.1% vs. 65.0%, difference 22.1 points, 95% CI 2.6 to 44.7; patient 81.3% vs. 58.3%, 22.9 points, 95% CI 2.4 to 43.9), converging by 12 months (96.9% vs. 95.0%). Analgesic-free rates were lower with PHT on postoperative days (POD) 7 and 10. Conclusions: Digital monitoring captured granular recovery trajectories and identified a mid-term social-continence signal associated with PHT, compatible with a transient delay in recovery. These hypothesis-generating findings support embedding standardized digital functional-outcome monitoring in perioperative trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16172748
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Patient-Reported Monitoring of Functional Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With or Without Perioperative Hormonal Therapy

Bernard Malavaud, Bogdan Adrian Buhaş, Benjamin Pradère, Christophe Tollon et al.
Diagnostics
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Digital Patient-Reported Monitoring of Functional Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With or Without Perioperative Hormonal Therapy

Bernard Malavaud, Bogdan Adrian Buhaş, Benjamin Pradère, Christophe Tollon, Giorgio Calleris, Guilhem Roubaud, Alessandro Uleri, Damien Pouessel, Guillaume Ploussard, Loïc Mourey, Marine Lesourd
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Perioperative androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) are increasingly used in high-risk prostate cancer, yet patient-centred functional-recovery data after radical prostatectomy are scarce and rarely standardized. We assessed whether a smartphone-based digital monitoring pathway could characterize social-continence recovery and capture differences associated with a perioperative hormonal therapy (PHT) strategy after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph-node dissection (RARP + LND). Methods: In a two-centre consecutive cohort (n = 98) of men with high-risk, non-metastatic prostate cancer aligned with SUGAR and PROTEUS criteria, we compared upfront surgery (standard of care [SOC], n = 72) with a planned PHT strategy (ADT or ARPI, n = 26); all patients were urinary-continent preoperatively. Clinical data were prospective; patient-reported and patient-experience measures were captured through a routine-care digital platform (Betty Coaching application) delivering an identical prehabilitation/rehabilitation pathway to both groups, with pre- and postoperative pelvic-floor muscle training performed by all patients. The primary endpoint was 6-month social continence (0–1 pad/day), assessed by clinician and patient reports as co-primary sources. Differences are reported as risk differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: At 6 weeks, no statistically clear difference was observed (clinician 66.2% vs. 56.5%; risk difference 9.7 percentage points, 95% CI −12 to 32). At 6 months, social continence was lower with PHT (clinician 87.1% vs. 65.0%, difference 22.1 points, 95% CI 2.6 to 44.7; patient 81.3% vs. 58.3%, 22.9 points, 95% CI 2.4 to 43.9), converging by 12 months (96.9% vs. 95.0%). Analgesic-free rates were lower with PHT on postoperative days (POD) 7 and 10. Conclusions: Digital monitoring captured granular recovery trajectories and identified a mid-term social-continence signal associated with PHT, compatible with a transient delay in recovery. These hypothesis-generating findings support embedding standardized digital functional-outcome monitoring in perioperative trials.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(17)
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (FR), Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon (FR), Institut Claudius Regaud (FR), Institut Bergonié (FR), Clinique Les Fontaines (FR), Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.