Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Military Cadets’ Mental Health Risk Scale (MCMHRS) in Chinese Military Academy Cadets

Background: Military academy cadets face training, study, and adaptational pressures that elevate the risk for mental health problems and functional impairment. Existing tools are either generic symptom checklists or narrow resilience scales; none integrates environmental risk, individual vulnerability, and protective resources within a unified hierarchical model relevant to this population. Methods: We developed and psychometrically evaluated the Military Cadets’ Mental Health Risk Scale (MCMHRS). After item generation and two-round Delphi review (n = 15), a 64-item pool was administered to 610 Chinese cadets (mean age 19.45 ± 1.42 years; 82.6% male), randomly split into calibration (n = 244) and validation (n = 366) subsamples for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and reliability/validity testing against the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and WHO-5. Results: The final 53-item scale comprised 13 first-order factors nested within three second-order dimensions, with excellent fit (RMSEA = 0.043, CFI = 0.978), strong internal consistency (α = 0.968), and coherent correlations with PHQ-9 (r = 0.70), GAD-7 (r = 0.69), and WHO-5 (r = −0.58). Conclusions: The MCMHRS shows initial evidence of being a psychometrically sound, culturally relevant, multilevel assessment tool that may support early identification and tiered intervention in cadet mental healthcare pending further longitudinal validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14172730
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Military Cadets’ Mental Health Risk Scale (MCMHRS) in Chinese Military Academy Cadets

Jia Guo, Feifei Wang, Guoyu Yang
Healthcare
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Military Cadets’ Mental Health Risk Scale (MCMHRS) in Chinese Military Academy Cadets

Jia Guo, Feifei Wang, Guoyu Yang
article en

Abstract

Background: Military academy cadets face training, study, and adaptational pressures that elevate the risk for mental health problems and functional impairment. Existing tools are either generic symptom checklists or narrow resilience scales; none integrates environmental risk, individual vulnerability, and protective resources within a unified hierarchical model relevant to this population. Methods: We developed and psychometrically evaluated the Military Cadets’ Mental Health Risk Scale (MCMHRS). After item generation and two-round Delphi review (n = 15), a 64-item pool was administered to 610 Chinese cadets (mean age 19.45 ± 1.42 years; 82.6% male), randomly split into calibration (n = 244) and validation (n = 366) subsamples for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and reliability/validity testing against the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and WHO-5. Results: The final 53-item scale comprised 13 first-order factors nested within three second-order dimensions, with excellent fit (RMSEA = 0.043, CFI = 0.978), strong internal consistency (α = 0.968), and coherent correlations with PHQ-9 (r = 0.70), GAD-7 (r = 0.69), and WHO-5 (r = −0.58). Conclusions: The MCMHRS shows initial evidence of being a psychometrically sound, culturally relevant, multilevel assessment tool that may support early identification and tiered intervention in cadet mental healthcare pending further longitudinal validation.

HealthcareVol. 14(17)
Army Medical University (CN), Chongqing Vocational Institute of Engineering (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.