Evaluation of Community Disaster Risk Reduction Capacity and Sustainable Improvement Pathways: A Case Study of the Central Urban Area of Xiangtan, China

Evaluating and improving community disaster risk reduction capacity (CDRRC) is a crucial concern in the theory and application of urban catastrophe management. Nonetheless, current evaluation frameworks frequently concentrate on a solitary discipline or a restricted array of metrics, while capacity-building initiatives generally neglect sustainability considerations. To rectify this deficiency, this study utilizes Chinese national standards and implements their three-tier indicator framework for evaluating CDRRC; subsequently, it employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to ascertain the significance of the indicators and evaluates 10 communities in the central urban area of Xiangtan using the TOPSIS methodology. Our research revealed that the most significant first-level indicators—disaster management (0.3362) and disaster prevention and preparedness (0.3230)—are crucial for a community’s ability to reduce disaster risk, while other second- and third-level indicators highlight particular priority areas. The relative proximity of the sample communities varied between 0.3273 and 0.5868, with an average of 0.4287, indicating that their disaster risk reduction capacity is low to moderate. The relative proximity among the first-level indicators further revealed variations in capacity dimensions, facilitating the classification of six community types—from “synergistic advantage” to “comprehensively lagging”—each possessing distinct characteristics related to disaster risk reduction capacity and improvement requirements. To improve CDRRC in accordance with sustainability goals, it is crucial to refine coordination and risk evaluation, optimize resource allocation and training, strengthen information dissemination and communication, and enhance team cohesion and infrastructure, thereby fortifying the foundations of governance and resilience for sustainable community development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18178795
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Community Disaster Risk Reduction Capacity and Sustainable Improvement Pathways: A Case Study of the Central Urban Area of Xiangtan, China

Yulong Yun, Xinru Yang
Sustainability
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Evaluation of Community Disaster Risk Reduction Capacity and Sustainable Improvement Pathways: A Case Study of the Central Urban Area of Xiangtan, China

Yulong Yun, Xinru Yang
article en

Abstract

Evaluating and improving community disaster risk reduction capacity (CDRRC) is a crucial concern in the theory and application of urban catastrophe management. Nonetheless, current evaluation frameworks frequently concentrate on a solitary discipline or a restricted array of metrics, while capacity-building initiatives generally neglect sustainability considerations. To rectify this deficiency, this study utilizes Chinese national standards and implements their three-tier indicator framework for evaluating CDRRC; subsequently, it employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to ascertain the significance of the indicators and evaluates 10 communities in the central urban area of Xiangtan using the TOPSIS methodology. Our research revealed that the most significant first-level indicators—disaster management (0.3362) and disaster prevention and preparedness (0.3230)—are crucial for a community’s ability to reduce disaster risk, while other second- and third-level indicators highlight particular priority areas. The relative proximity of the sample communities varied between 0.3273 and 0.5868, with an average of 0.4287, indicating that their disaster risk reduction capacity is low to moderate. The relative proximity among the first-level indicators further revealed variations in capacity dimensions, facilitating the classification of six community types—from “synergistic advantage” to “comprehensively lagging”—each possessing distinct characteristics related to disaster risk reduction capacity and improvement requirements. To improve CDRRC in accordance with sustainability goals, it is crucial to refine coordination and risk evaluation, optimize resource allocation and training, strengthen information dissemination and communication, and enhance team cohesion and infrastructure, thereby fortifying the foundations of governance and resilience for sustainable community development.

SustainabilityVol. 18(17)
Xiangtan University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Community Disaster Risk Reduction Capacity and Sustainable Improvement Pathways: A Case Study of the Central Urban Area of Xiangtan, China — Yulong Yun, Xinru Yang · Sustainability (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS