Generality and Context-Specificity of Executive Function in College Students with Bullying Victimization Experiences

Although previous research has confirmed an association between bullying victimization and executive function (EF) impairments, the long-term trajectory of these deficits remains controversial, specifically whether they persist as permanent scars into adulthood or are subject to a degree of neuroplastic recovery through brain maturation and subsequent learning experiences. Moreover, prior studies have largely focused on relatively stable, cross-task deficits, with limited examination of whether EF performance is dynamically modulated by victimization-related contextual cues. Accordingly, the present study examined the differences in EF performance among individuals with a history of bullying victimization under both general processing conditions and context-induced conditions through two experiments. Experiment 1a and Experiment 2a assessed general inhibitory control (IC) and working memory (WM) using the classic Stroop and N-back paradigms, respectively. Experiment 1b and Experiment 2b introduced victimization-related contextual cues into these paradigms to examine context-dependent alterations in cognitive control. The results showed that, under general conditions, the victimization group exhibited significantly longer reaction times (RTs) than the control group in both the Stroop and N-back tasks, indicating less efficient general cognitive processing. Further analyses revealed distinct patterns under context-specific conditions: in the adapted Stroop paradigm, the victimization group showed relatively faster RTs in victimization-related contexts, suggesting context-dependent differences in interference control; in contrast, in the WM task, RTs were prolonged in victimization-related contexts, suggesting greater contextual interference during WM processing. In conclusion, bullying victimization is associated not only with general differences in EF performance among college students but also with context-dependent alterations in cognitive processing. These findings highlight the context-dependent effects of bullying-related cues on EF and provide behavioral evidence that bullying victimization is associated with alterations in cognitive control processes, with potential implications for developing targeted intervention strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091509
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generality and Context-Specificity of Executive Function in College Students with Bullying Victimization Experiences

FU Shuying, Yu Gu, Mengmeng Zhao, Peng Li
Behavioral Sciences
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

Generality and Context-Specificity of Executive Function in College Students with Bullying Victimization Experiences

FU Shuying, Yu Gu, Mengmeng Zhao, Peng Li
article en

Abstract

Although previous research has confirmed an association between bullying victimization and executive function (EF) impairments, the long-term trajectory of these deficits remains controversial, specifically whether they persist as permanent scars into adulthood or are subject to a degree of neuroplastic recovery through brain maturation and subsequent learning experiences. Moreover, prior studies have largely focused on relatively stable, cross-task deficits, with limited examination of whether EF performance is dynamically modulated by victimization-related contextual cues. Accordingly, the present study examined the differences in EF performance among individuals with a history of bullying victimization under both general processing conditions and context-induced conditions through two experiments. Experiment 1a and Experiment 2a assessed general inhibitory control (IC) and working memory (WM) using the classic Stroop and N-back paradigms, respectively. Experiment 1b and Experiment 2b introduced victimization-related contextual cues into these paradigms to examine context-dependent alterations in cognitive control. The results showed that, under general conditions, the victimization group exhibited significantly longer reaction times (RTs) than the control group in both the Stroop and N-back tasks, indicating less efficient general cognitive processing. Further analyses revealed distinct patterns under context-specific conditions: in the adapted Stroop paradigm, the victimization group showed relatively faster RTs in victimization-related contexts, suggesting context-dependent differences in interference control; in contrast, in the WM task, RTs were prolonged in victimization-related contexts, suggesting greater contextual interference during WM processing. In conclusion, bullying victimization is associated not only with general differences in EF performance among college students but also with context-dependent alterations in cognitive processing. These findings highlight the context-dependent effects of bullying-related cues on EF and provide behavioral evidence that bullying victimization is associated with alterations in cognitive control processes, with potential implications for developing targeted intervention strategies.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(9)
North China University of Science and Technology (CN), Tianjin Normal University (CN), Yancheng Teachers University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.