Community-led organisations’ impact on health and well-being in disadvantaged areas in the UK: evidence from the CommonHealth Assets longitudinal study

BACKGROUND: Community-led organisations (CLOs) are place-based, community governed entities that aim to enhance health and well-being in disadvantaged communities using asset-based approaches. Currently the relationship between CLO participation and health and well-being outcomes is unclear. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal survey was designed as part of a multimethod, realist study: CommonHealth Assets. Questionnaires at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months assessed capability, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), mental well-being, social connectedness and CLO attendance patterns (n=316 adults, 14 UK CLOs). Multilevel mixed-effects models assessed associations between participation and well-being outcomes, adjusting for participant and CLO characteristics. RESULTS: Higher total CLO engagement was positively associated with mental well-being (Coeff: 0.895, 95% CI 0.178 to 1.612, p=0.015) and capability well-being (Coeff: 0.025, 95% CI -0.003 to 0.053, p=0.081). Child and family activities showed positive associations with capability well-being (Coeff: 0.087, 95% CI 0.035 to 0.138, p=0.001) and social connectedness (Coeff: 0.357, 95% CI 0.117 to 0.597, p=0.004). Frequency analysis revealed linear dose-response relationships for outdoor activities on HR-QoL (Coeff: 0.113, 95% CI 0.037 to 0.189, p=0.004) and non-linear relationships for others such as volunteering on capability well-being (linear Coeff: 0.101, p=0.023; squared Coeff: -0.057, p=0.041) and educational activities on HR-QoL (squared Coeff: 0.308, 95% CI 0.122 to 0.495, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: CLO engagement is associated with better well-being outcomes. Associations vary by activity, revealing temporal and dose-response patterns. Findings provide robust quantitative evidence consistent with the premise that CLOs can enhance different dimensions of well-being, informing intervention design, resource allocation and policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2025-225259
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community-led organisations’ impact on health and well-being in disadvantaged areas in the UK: evidence from the CommonHealth Assets longitudinal study

Jill Mulholland, Marcello Bertotti, Sarkis Manoukian, Karen Galway et al.
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
Community Health and Development
article

Community-led organisations’ impact on health and well-being in disadvantaged areas in the UK: evidence from the CommonHealth Assets longitudinal study

Jill Mulholland, Marcello Bertotti, Sarkis Manoukian, Karen Galway, Rachel Baker, Michael P. Kelly, Helen Mason, Nicola Irvine, Artur Steiner, Jack Rendall
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community-led organisations (CLOs) are place-based, community governed entities that aim to enhance health and well-being in disadvantaged communities using asset-based approaches. Currently the relationship between CLO participation and health and well-being outcomes is unclear. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal survey was designed as part of a multimethod, realist study: CommonHealth Assets. Questionnaires at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months assessed capability, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), mental well-being, social connectedness and CLO attendance patterns (n=316 adults, 14 UK CLOs). Multilevel mixed-effects models assessed associations between participation and well-being outcomes, adjusting for participant and CLO characteristics. RESULTS: Higher total CLO engagement was positively associated with mental well-being (Coeff: 0.895, 95% CI 0.178 to 1.612, p=0.015) and capability well-being (Coeff: 0.025, 95% CI -0.003 to 0.053, p=0.081). Child and family activities showed positive associations with capability well-being (Coeff: 0.087, 95% CI 0.035 to 0.138, p=0.001) and social connectedness (Coeff: 0.357, 95% CI 0.117 to 0.597, p=0.004). Frequency analysis revealed linear dose-response relationships for outdoor activities on HR-QoL (Coeff: 0.113, 95% CI 0.037 to 0.189, p=0.004) and non-linear relationships for others such as volunteering on capability well-being (linear Coeff: 0.101, p=0.023; squared Coeff: -0.057, p=0.041) and educational activities on HR-QoL (squared Coeff: 0.308, 95% CI 0.122 to 0.495, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: CLO engagement is associated with better well-being outcomes. Associations vary by activity, revealing temporal and dose-response patterns. Findings provide robust quantitative evidence consistent with the premise that CLOs can enhance different dimensions of well-being, informing intervention design, resource allocation and policy.

Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of East London (GB), Glasgow Caledonian University (GB), University of Cambridge (GB)
Public Health Research Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.