Community-led organisations’ impact on health and well-being in disadvantaged areas in the UK: evidence from the CommonHealth Assets longitudinal study
BACKGROUND: Community-led organisations (CLOs) are place-based, community governed entities that aim to enhance health and well-being in disadvantaged communities using asset-based approaches. Currently the relationship between CLO participation and health and well-being outcomes is unclear. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal survey was designed as part of a multimethod, realist study: CommonHealth Assets. Questionnaires at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months assessed capability, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), mental well-being, social connectedness and CLO attendance patterns (n=316 adults, 14 UK CLOs). Multilevel mixed-effects models assessed associations between participation and well-being outcomes, adjusting for participant and CLO characteristics. RESULTS: Higher total CLO engagement was positively associated with mental well-being (Coeff: 0.895, 95% CI 0.178 to 1.612, p=0.015) and capability well-being (Coeff: 0.025, 95% CI -0.003 to 0.053, p=0.081). Child and family activities showed positive associations with capability well-being (Coeff: 0.087, 95% CI 0.035 to 0.138, p=0.001) and social connectedness (Coeff: 0.357, 95% CI 0.117 to 0.597, p=0.004). Frequency analysis revealed linear dose-response relationships for outdoor activities on HR-QoL (Coeff: 0.113, 95% CI 0.037 to 0.189, p=0.004) and non-linear relationships for others such as volunteering on capability well-being (linear Coeff: 0.101, p=0.023; squared Coeff: -0.057, p=0.041) and educational activities on HR-QoL (squared Coeff: 0.308, 95% CI 0.122 to 0.495, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: CLO engagement is associated with better well-being outcomes. Associations vary by activity, revealing temporal and dose-response patterns. Findings provide robust quantitative evidence consistent with the premise that CLOs can enhance different dimensions of well-being, informing intervention design, resource allocation and policy.
Authors
- Jill Mulholland (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0112-4083)
- Marcello Bertotti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3356-7129)
- Sarkis Manoukian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5057-8236)
- Karen Galway (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4216-6135)
- Rachel Baker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3451-2018)
- Michael P. Kelly (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-5841)
- Helen Mason (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9303-2794)
- Nicola Irvine
- Artur Steiner
- Jack Rendall
Institutions
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- University of East London (GB)
- Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
- Published
- 2026-08-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2025-225259
- Primary Topic
- Community Health and Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Public Health Research Programme