When perception and practice diverge: a socioecological study of urban forest wildlife in Patagonia

Although urbanization continues to erode natural barriers between people and wildlife, the socioecological dynamics shaping these interactions remain insufficiently understood, particularly in rapidly expanding South American cities. Therefore, our aim was to assess residents’ knowledge, perceptions, and practices related to urban forest wildlife in Andean Patagonia through semi-structured surveys in Bariloche, the largest city in the region. We conducted 95 in-person household surveys to evaluate species recognition using structured questions, photographs, and audio recordings, comparing perceived presence with ecological records across neighborhoods. Peridomestic practices and perceived threats to wildlife were also examined. Finally, we contrasted in-person responses with online survey data to evaluate how survey mode may influence representations of local realities. Residents tended to recognize charismatic species more readily than common ones and correctly identified habitat loss as the principal threat to wildlife, despite limited knowledge of species-specific habitat requirements. We identified mismatches between perceived threats and everyday peridomestic practices, some of which may negatively impact wildlife. Online surveys were skewed toward respondents with higher educational attainment and women, generating distinct patterns in reported practices and perceptions. Such biases may misguide assessments of the social drivers of biodiversity change and, consequently, inform management decisions based on incomplete social representations. Our findings underscore the need to explicitly integrate socioecological evidence into urban biodiversity governance. Incorporating empirically grounded understanding of residents’ knowledge and practices can strengthen evidence-informed conservation strategies and contribute to maintaining functional peri-urban landscapes in the rapidly transforming cities of South America.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Processes
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-026-00736-y
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When perception and practice diverge: a socioecological study of urban forest wildlife in Patagonia

M. Lucía Bocelli, M. Laura Suarez, Valeria S. Ojeda
Ecological Processes
Urban Green Space and Health
article

When perception and practice diverge: a socioecological study of urban forest wildlife in Patagonia

M. Lucía Bocelli, M. Laura Suarez, Valeria S. Ojeda
article en

Abstract

Although urbanization continues to erode natural barriers between people and wildlife, the socioecological dynamics shaping these interactions remain insufficiently understood, particularly in rapidly expanding South American cities. Therefore, our aim was to assess residents’ knowledge, perceptions, and practices related to urban forest wildlife in Andean Patagonia through semi-structured surveys in Bariloche, the largest city in the region. We conducted 95 in-person household surveys to evaluate species recognition using structured questions, photographs, and audio recordings, comparing perceived presence with ecological records across neighborhoods. Peridomestic practices and perceived threats to wildlife were also examined. Finally, we contrasted in-person responses with online survey data to evaluate how survey mode may influence representations of local realities. Residents tended to recognize charismatic species more readily than common ones and correctly identified habitat loss as the principal threat to wildlife, despite limited knowledge of species-specific habitat requirements. We identified mismatches between perceived threats and everyday peridomestic practices, some of which may negatively impact wildlife. Online surveys were skewed toward respondents with higher educational attainment and women, generating distinct patterns in reported practices and perceptions. Such biases may misguide assessments of the social drivers of biodiversity change and, consequently, inform management decisions based on incomplete social representations. Our findings underscore the need to explicitly integrate socioecological evidence into urban biodiversity governance. Incorporating empirically grounded understanding of residents’ knowledge and practices can strengthen evidence-informed conservation strategies and contribute to maintaining functional peri-urban landscapes in the rapidly transforming cities of South America.

Ecological ProcessesVol. 15(1)
Universidad Nacional del Comahue (AR)
Rufford Foundation, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When perception and practice diverge: a socioecological study of urban forest wildlife in Patagonia — M. Lucía Bocelli, M. Laura Suarez, et al. · Ecological Processes (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS