Prophylactic endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy in high-risk ultra-low rectal anastomoses: a retrospective comparative study of feasibility and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after ultra-low anterior resection (uLAR) for rectal cancer, when the anastomosis is located ≤ 5 cm from the anal verge, in patients with additionally risk factors. This study proposes the prophylactic endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy (pEVAT) as a feasible strategy that may reduce AL incidence and promote healing in this subgroup of patients. METHODS: Thirty-three patients multiple established risk factors for AL who underwent uLAR with a diverting stoma were retrospectively analyzed. Thirteen patients received pEVAT intraoperatively using a polyurethane sponge, while twenty patients served as the control group. The main outcomes included AL rate, secondary outcomes were anastomotic stenosis, other postoperative complications, length of hospital stay as well as stoma reversal. RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage occurred in 7.7% of patients receiving pEVAT versus 30% in the control group. Unadjusted risk estimation demonstrated lower odds of leakage in the pEVAT group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Anastomotic stenosis was also observed in 7.7% of the pEVAT group compared to 35% of controls. The stoma reversal rate was higher in the pEVAT group (76.9% vs. 55%). Mean hospital stay was shorter (26 vs. 36 days). No mortality occurred in the pEVAT group, and complications were limited. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic EVAT is a feasible and safe approach that may have a protective role against anastomotic complications in selected high-risk patients undergoing uLAR. Larger, prospective, and ideally randomized studies are required to clarify its clinical effect in this subgroup.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03771-w
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prophylactic endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy in high-risk ultra-low rectal anastomoses: a retrospective comparative study of feasibility and clinical outcomes

Nour Alkhanji, Saleh Lahes, Nadja Lehwald, Eslam Elmaghraby et al.
BMC Surgery
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Prophylactic endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy in high-risk ultra-low rectal anastomoses: a retrospective comparative study of feasibility and clinical outcomes

Nour Alkhanji, Saleh Lahes, Nadja Lehwald, Eslam Elmaghraby, Wolfram Trudo Kneofel, Mohammed Abdulla
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after ultra-low anterior resection (uLAR) for rectal cancer, when the anastomosis is located ≤ 5 cm from the anal verge, in patients with additionally risk factors. This study proposes the prophylactic endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy (pEVAT) as a feasible strategy that may reduce AL incidence and promote healing in this subgroup of patients. METHODS: Thirty-three patients multiple established risk factors for AL who underwent uLAR with a diverting stoma were retrospectively analyzed. Thirteen patients received pEVAT intraoperatively using a polyurethane sponge, while twenty patients served as the control group. The main outcomes included AL rate, secondary outcomes were anastomotic stenosis, other postoperative complications, length of hospital stay as well as stoma reversal. RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage occurred in 7.7% of patients receiving pEVAT versus 30% in the control group. Unadjusted risk estimation demonstrated lower odds of leakage in the pEVAT group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Anastomotic stenosis was also observed in 7.7% of the pEVAT group compared to 35% of controls. The stoma reversal rate was higher in the pEVAT group (76.9% vs. 55%). Mean hospital stay was shorter (26 vs. 36 days). No mortality occurred in the pEVAT group, and complications were limited. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic EVAT is a feasible and safe approach that may have a protective role against anastomotic complications in selected high-risk patients undergoing uLAR. Larger, prospective, and ideally randomized studies are required to clarify its clinical effect in this subgroup.

BMC SurgeryVol. 26(1)
University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.