Putting the human at the core of human-in-the-loop optimization: integrating clinical expertise and human capacities in exoskeleton learning. An interdisciplinary perspective paper.

PURPOSE: This interdisciplinary perspective aims to identify key limitations in current Human-in-the-Loop Optimization (HILO) approaches for lower-limb exoskeletons (LLEs) and to propose a shift toward more human-centred optimization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Drawing on literature from wearable robotics, rehabilitation science, motor learning, and clinical practice, we critically discuss three main limitations of current HILO approaches: narrow optimization scope, limited consideration of individual capabilities, and disconnection from personalized training. RESULTS: We argue that human-centered optimization should not only integrate physiotherapists' expertise but also expand their role as research partners in LLE development. Physiotherapists can contribute to adaptive control design, define user-centered outcome measures, and develop evidence-based training protocols that align human learning with technological adaptation. To support this shift, future research should prioritize: (1) using AI to interpret real-time, context-specific and user-specific data; (2) enabling physiotherapists to fine-tune device parameters based on individualized profiles; and (3) embedding structured, therapist-led training within HILO frameworks. CONCLUSION: Advancing human-centered HILO will require adaptable prototypes, multidimensional outcome measures, and sustained collaboration between engineering and rehabilitation science. This shift may help ensure that LLEs evolve into technologies that enhance mobility, autonomy, and participation in ways that are meaningful for users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2720761
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Putting the human at the core of human-in-the-loop optimization: integrating clinical expertise and human capacities in exoskeleton learning. An interdisciplinary perspective paper.

Benjamin Filtjens, R Claeys, Eva Swinnen, Mahyar Firouzi et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Putting the human at the core of human-in-the-loop optimization: integrating clinical expertise and human capacities in exoskeleton learning. An interdisciplinary perspective paper.

Benjamin Filtjens, R Claeys, Eva Swinnen, Mahyar Firouzi, Tom Verstraten, Matthias Eggermont, Jeroen Aeles, Chiara Lambranzi, Louis Flynn, David Beckwée
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This interdisciplinary perspective aims to identify key limitations in current Human-in-the-Loop Optimization (HILO) approaches for lower-limb exoskeletons (LLEs) and to propose a shift toward more human-centred optimization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Drawing on literature from wearable robotics, rehabilitation science, motor learning, and clinical practice, we critically discuss three main limitations of current HILO approaches: narrow optimization scope, limited consideration of individual capabilities, and disconnection from personalized training. RESULTS: We argue that human-centered optimization should not only integrate physiotherapists' expertise but also expand their role as research partners in LLE development. Physiotherapists can contribute to adaptive control design, define user-centered outcome measures, and develop evidence-based training protocols that align human learning with technological adaptation. To support this shift, future research should prioritize: (1) using AI to interpret real-time, context-specific and user-specific data; (2) enabling physiotherapists to fine-tune device parameters based on individualized profiles; and (3) embedding structured, therapist-led training within HILO frameworks. CONCLUSION: Advancing human-centered HILO will require adaptable prototypes, multidimensional outcome measures, and sustained collaboration between engineering and rehabilitation science. This shift may help ensure that LLEs evolve into technologies that enhance mobility, autonomy, and participation in ways that are meaningful for users.

Disability and Rehabilitation
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Antwerp (BE), Italian Institute of Technology (IT), Pain in Motion (BE), Engineering Systems (United States) (US), Flanders Make (Belgium) (BE), Robotics Research (United States) (US), Center for Neurosciences (US), Politecnico di Milano (IT), Delft University of Technology (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.