State-led inclusion or temporary relief? Evaluating SA’s presidential employment stimulus through a sustainable development lens

This paper evaluates South Africa’s Presidential Employment Stimulus (PES), launched in October 2020, to assess whether direct public employment can mitigate structural youth unemployment. Using 15 years of Quarterly Labour Force Survey data (2010 Q1–24 Q4) and a trend-adjusted difference-in-differences design, the study examines individuals aged 18–35 (matching BEEI eligibility) against a control group aged 36–45, with covariates and survey-design-robust standard errors. The findings indicate persistent labour market scarring: by 2024, the youth–adult employment gap remained wider than its 2019 level. However, trend-adjusted estimates indicate a 3.8 percentage point deviation from the pre-existing downward trajectory (SE = 0.005, p < 0.001). A placebo test supports the specification’s validity. Heterogeneity analysis shows broadly distributed stabilisation across gender and education groups. The findings suggest direct public employment can play a stabilising role but cannot independently reverse structural youth unemployment in a low-growth environment. The study relies on repeated cross-sectional data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Development Southern Africa
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835x.2026.2718381
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State-led inclusion or temporary relief? Evaluating SA’s presidential employment stimulus through a sustainable development lens

Zakariyya Desai
Development Southern Africa
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
article

State-led inclusion or temporary relief? Evaluating SA’s presidential employment stimulus through a sustainable development lens

Zakariyya Desai
article en

Abstract

This paper evaluates South Africa’s Presidential Employment Stimulus (PES), launched in October 2020, to assess whether direct public employment can mitigate structural youth unemployment. Using 15 years of Quarterly Labour Force Survey data (2010 Q1–24 Q4) and a trend-adjusted difference-in-differences design, the study examines individuals aged 18–35 (matching BEEI eligibility) against a control group aged 36–45, with covariates and survey-design-robust standard errors. The findings indicate persistent labour market scarring: by 2024, the youth–adult employment gap remained wider than its 2019 level. However, trend-adjusted estimates indicate a 3.8 percentage point deviation from the pre-existing downward trajectory (SE = 0.005, p < 0.001). A placebo test supports the specification’s validity. Heterogeneity analysis shows broadly distributed stabilisation across gender and education groups. The findings suggest direct public employment can play a stabilising role but cannot independently reverse structural youth unemployment in a low-growth environment. The study relies on repeated cross-sectional data.

Development Southern Africa
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

State-led inclusion or temporary relief? Evaluating SA’s presidential employment stimulus through a sustainable development lens — Zakariyya Desai · Development Southern Africa (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS