PNS-WINGS-AHP–EWM Integrated Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: An Application-Oriented Decision Framework in Digital Agriculture

Digital-agriculture development increasingly requires multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approaches to evaluate complex and interrelated influencing factors. However, existing methods often face difficulties in representing uncertain expert judgments, capturing inter-factor influence structures, and integrating complementary weighting information. To address these challenges, this study develops an integrated Pythagorean Neutrosophic Sets (PNS)–Weighted Influence Non-linear Gauge System (WINGS)–Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)–Entropy Weight Method (EWM) framework for digital-agriculture factor evaluation. Specifically, PNS is employed to represent uncertain linguistic assessments through truth, indeterminacy, and falsity information; WINGS is applied to identify the direction and intensity of expert-perceived influence relationships among factors; and a coordinated weighting mechanism integrates AHP-based preference information with entropy-based cross-expert dispersion information. The proposed framework is applied to a digital-agriculture case to identify key influencing factors and determine development priorities. The results indicate that Economic Development Level (W1) ranks first in the final composite priority assessment, followed by Digital Technology Level (W6) and Digital Infrastructure (W5). Furthermore, the WINGS analysis reveals the perceived influence structure among factors and identifies Digital Infrastructure (W5) as the strongest net-influencing factor within the network. Comparative analyses suggest that the proposed framework provides a systematic representation of uncertainty, influence relationships, and complementary weighting information for digital-agriculture factor evaluation. This study highlights the application potential of integrating established MCDM techniques to support complex agricultural decision-making problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18091435
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PNS-WINGS-AHP–EWM Integrated Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: An Application-Oriented Decision Framework in Digital Agriculture

Kecheng Zhang, Yawen Wang
Symmetry
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

PNS-WINGS-AHP–EWM Integrated Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: An Application-Oriented Decision Framework in Digital Agriculture

Kecheng Zhang, Yawen Wang
article en

Abstract

Digital-agriculture development increasingly requires multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approaches to evaluate complex and interrelated influencing factors. However, existing methods often face difficulties in representing uncertain expert judgments, capturing inter-factor influence structures, and integrating complementary weighting information. To address these challenges, this study develops an integrated Pythagorean Neutrosophic Sets (PNS)–Weighted Influence Non-linear Gauge System (WINGS)–Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)–Entropy Weight Method (EWM) framework for digital-agriculture factor evaluation. Specifically, PNS is employed to represent uncertain linguistic assessments through truth, indeterminacy, and falsity information; WINGS is applied to identify the direction and intensity of expert-perceived influence relationships among factors; and a coordinated weighting mechanism integrates AHP-based preference information with entropy-based cross-expert dispersion information. The proposed framework is applied to a digital-agriculture case to identify key influencing factors and determine development priorities. The results indicate that Economic Development Level (W1) ranks first in the final composite priority assessment, followed by Digital Technology Level (W6) and Digital Infrastructure (W5). Furthermore, the WINGS analysis reveals the perceived influence structure among factors and identifies Digital Infrastructure (W5) as the strongest net-influencing factor within the network. Comparative analyses suggest that the proposed framework provides a systematic representation of uncertainty, influence relationships, and complementary weighting information for digital-agriculture factor evaluation. This study highlights the application potential of integrating established MCDM techniques to support complex agricultural decision-making problems.

SymmetryVol. 18(9)
Shandong Women’s University (CN), Shandong Agricultural University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.