Developing priority strategies for ensuring data security: the case of healthcare services

Ensuring healthcare data security is a critical challenge as digital transformation accelerates across the sector. This study aims to prioritize strategies for improving data security in healthcare organizations using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. Expert opinions were obtained from professionals with extensive experience in health informatics and decision-making authority. In this context, hospital administrators, academics, and IT specialists with at least 10 years of decision-making experience constitute the expert selection criteria. Ten experts meeting these criteria have been identified and contacted for their feedback. The study applied the Simple Weight Calculation (SIWEC) and Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) methods, both integrated with Fermatean fuzzy numbers, to assess and rank criteria influencing data security. Euclidean-based expert weighting was used to account for variations in expertise and experience. Our findings highlight technical technology (IT) infrastructure as the most critical determinants of data security, with a weighting score of 0.203. Among the proposed strategies, multi-factor authentication (w = 0.8596) and scope of specific legal regulations for health data (w = 0.8004) were prioritized as key interventions. Our study contributes a novel methodological application of fuzzy MCDM techniques to healthcare data security and provides practical guidance for developing robust, context-sensitive governance and protection strategies. This novelty marks the first-ever integration of SIWEC, MARCOS, and Euclidean-based expert weighting in a Fermatean fuzzy environment, and it is the first application of this integration in the healthcare field. Practical guide outlines the priority actions for managers and decision-makers seeking to improve data security. Therefore, in healthcare organizations where scarce resources need to be managed effectively, it will determine where available resources should be prioritized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15343-y
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Developing priority strategies for ensuring data security: the case of healthcare services

Serkan Eti, Yaşar Gökalp, Axel Kaehne
BMC Health Services Research
Information and Cyber Security
article

Developing priority strategies for ensuring data security: the case of healthcare services

Serkan Eti, Yaşar Gökalp, Axel Kaehne
article en

Abstract

Ensuring healthcare data security is a critical challenge as digital transformation accelerates across the sector. This study aims to prioritize strategies for improving data security in healthcare organizations using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. Expert opinions were obtained from professionals with extensive experience in health informatics and decision-making authority. In this context, hospital administrators, academics, and IT specialists with at least 10 years of decision-making experience constitute the expert selection criteria. Ten experts meeting these criteria have been identified and contacted for their feedback. The study applied the Simple Weight Calculation (SIWEC) and Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) methods, both integrated with Fermatean fuzzy numbers, to assess and rank criteria influencing data security. Euclidean-based expert weighting was used to account for variations in expertise and experience. Our findings highlight technical technology (IT) infrastructure as the most critical determinants of data security, with a weighting score of 0.203. Among the proposed strategies, multi-factor authentication (w = 0.8596) and scope of specific legal regulations for health data (w = 0.8004) were prioritized as key interventions. Our study contributes a novel methodological application of fuzzy MCDM techniques to healthcare data security and provides practical guidance for developing robust, context-sensitive governance and protection strategies. This novelty marks the first-ever integration of SIWEC, MARCOS, and Euclidean-based expert weighting in a Fermatean fuzzy environment, and it is the first application of this integration in the healthcare field. Practical guide outlines the priority actions for managers and decision-makers seeking to improve data security. Therefore, in healthcare organizations where scarce resources need to be managed effectively, it will determine where available resources should be prioritized.

BMC Health Services Research
Cyprus International University (CY), Edge Hill University (GB), Istanbul Medipol University (TR), Marmara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.