Multidimensional Cognitive-State Modeling and an Adaptive Cognitive Load Twin for AI-Supported Managerial Decision-Making

Artificial intelligence (AI)-supported decision systems can improve managerial decision-making, but their cognitive implications may depend on how information, explanations, alerts, time pressure, uncertainty, autonomy, and human control are configured. This study develops an Adaptive Cognitive Load Twin using data from 420 logistics and supply-chain professionals in Türkiye who completed four AI-supported managerial decision scenarios, yielding 1680 participant–scenario observations. The framework models information overload, cognitive load, decision fatigue, perceived explainability, trust in AI, automation bias, perceived human control, perceived decision quality, and objective decision accuracy as distinct but related dimensions. Participant-clustered path analysis showed that higher information overload was associated with higher cognitive load, and higher cognitive load was strongly associated with higher decision fatigue; in turn, higher cognitive load and decision fatigue were associated with lower perceived decision quality. Higher perceived explainability was associated with lower cognitive load, greater trust, higher perceived decision quality, and lower automation-bias tendency, while greater perceived human control was associated with higher perceived decision quality and lower automation bias. Higher cognitive load was associated with lower objective decision accuracy. Participant-grouped machine learning models showed that cognitive load was more predictable than decision fatigue or objective accuracy, with information density and time pressure emerging as leading predictive contributors. Model-based simulations indicated that lower information density and progressive disclosure offered the clearest opportunities for adaptive support. The framework extends digital-twin logic toward multidimensional, human-centered monitoring and adaptation of cognitive conditions in AI-assisted managerial work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/data11090215
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidimensional Cognitive-State Modeling and an Adaptive Cognitive Load Twin for AI-Supported Managerial Decision-Making

Filiz Mızrak, Turhan Karakaya
Data
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Multidimensional Cognitive-State Modeling and an Adaptive Cognitive Load Twin for AI-Supported Managerial Decision-Making

Filiz Mızrak, Turhan Karakaya
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-supported decision systems can improve managerial decision-making, but their cognitive implications may depend on how information, explanations, alerts, time pressure, uncertainty, autonomy, and human control are configured. This study develops an Adaptive Cognitive Load Twin using data from 420 logistics and supply-chain professionals in Türkiye who completed four AI-supported managerial decision scenarios, yielding 1680 participant–scenario observations. The framework models information overload, cognitive load, decision fatigue, perceived explainability, trust in AI, automation bias, perceived human control, perceived decision quality, and objective decision accuracy as distinct but related dimensions. Participant-clustered path analysis showed that higher information overload was associated with higher cognitive load, and higher cognitive load was strongly associated with higher decision fatigue; in turn, higher cognitive load and decision fatigue were associated with lower perceived decision quality. Higher perceived explainability was associated with lower cognitive load, greater trust, higher perceived decision quality, and lower automation-bias tendency, while greater perceived human control was associated with higher perceived decision quality and lower automation bias. Higher cognitive load was associated with lower objective decision accuracy. Participant-grouped machine learning models showed that cognitive load was more predictable than decision fatigue or objective accuracy, with information density and time pressure emerging as leading predictive contributors. Model-based simulations indicated that lower information density and progressive disclosure offered the clearest opportunities for adaptive support. The framework extends digital-twin logic toward multidimensional, human-centered monitoring and adaptation of cognitive conditions in AI-assisted managerial work.

DataVol. 11(9)
Doğuş University (TR), Istanbul Technical University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.