Assessment of Narrow-Diameter Implants Placed in the Posterior Region for Rehabilitation with a Single Crown: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Clinical Study.

OBJECTIVE: Alveolar ridge atrophy is the result of extensive bone resorption. In cases where the available bone does not allow placement of standard-diameter implants without grafting, short and extra-short implants or narrow-diameter implants (NDI) may be used. NDIs exhibit high survival rates, reaching 95.5% after a nine-year follow-up. Thus, the goal of the present study was to evaluate outcomes of NDIs rehabilitated with a single crown in the posterior regions of the maxilla and the mandible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with Ti-Zr NDIs in the posterior region with single crowns were screened. Radiographic and clinical examinations were performed to evaluate marginal bone loss (MBL), peri-implant probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BoP), mobility, palpation, and percussion. Digital images were analyzed to measure and evaluate proximal bone loss. The implants were divided into groups: Group I (Success), II (Satisfactory), III (Compromised), and IV (Failure). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used (p=0.05). RESULTS: A total of 25 patients (56 Ti-Zr NDIs) were evaluated (mean follow-up: 3.3±1.1 years), with 100% survival rate; no mobility or pain was observed. The mean PPD was 2.11±0.65 mm, and BoP was present in 79.2% of cases. Radiographic analysis showed a mean mesial MBL of 0.83 ± 0.64 mm and a distal MBL of 0.91±0.78 mm. No significant correlation was found between MBL and PPD (p=0.45) or BoP (p=0.26). According to the success criteria, 91% (n=49) of implants were classified as successful (Group I), 7% (n=4) as satisfactory (Group II), and 2% (n=1) as compromised (Group III), with no failures recorded. CONCLUSION: NDIs in the posterior regions rehabilitated with a single-unit crown are a reasonable, reliable, and feasible option for oral rehabilitation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11710
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Assessment of Narrow-Diameter Implants Placed in the Posterior Region for Rehabilitation with a Single Crown: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Clinical Study.

Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes, Mirela Bergmann Carlucci, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes, Mohamed Rahhal et al.
PubMed
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Assessment of Narrow-Diameter Implants Placed in the Posterior Region for Rehabilitation with a Single Crown: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Clinical Study.

Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes, Mirela Bergmann Carlucci, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes, Mohamed Rahhal, Mona Samir Gaber, Julio Cesar Joly
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Alveolar ridge atrophy is the result of extensive bone resorption. In cases where the available bone does not allow placement of standard-diameter implants without grafting, short and extra-short implants or narrow-diameter implants (NDI) may be used. NDIs exhibit high survival rates, reaching 95.5% after a nine-year follow-up. Thus, the goal of the present study was to evaluate outcomes of NDIs rehabilitated with a single crown in the posterior regions of the maxilla and the mandible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with Ti-Zr NDIs in the posterior region with single crowns were screened. Radiographic and clinical examinations were performed to evaluate marginal bone loss (MBL), peri-implant probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BoP), mobility, palpation, and percussion. Digital images were analyzed to measure and evaluate proximal bone loss. The implants were divided into groups: Group I (Success), II (Satisfactory), III (Compromised), and IV (Failure). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used (p=0.05). RESULTS: A total of 25 patients (56 Ti-Zr NDIs) were evaluated (mean follow-up: 3.3±1.1 years), with 100% survival rate; no mobility or pain was observed. The mean PPD was 2.11±0.65 mm, and BoP was present in 79.2% of cases. Radiographic analysis showed a mean mesial MBL of 0.83 ± 0.64 mm and a distal MBL of 0.91±0.78 mm. No significant correlation was found between MBL and PPD (p=0.45) or BoP (p=0.26). According to the success criteria, 91% (n=49) of implants were classified as successful (Group I), 7% (n=4) as satisfactory (Group II), and 2% (n=1) as compromised (Group III), with no failures recorded. CONCLUSION: NDIs in the posterior regions rehabilitated with a single-unit crown are a reasonable, reliable, and feasible option for oral rehabilitation.

PubMedVol. 0(0)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.