Tower-Constrained Post-Processing of WRF Hub-Height Wind Speed for Regional Wind-Resource Screening in Hami, Xinjiang, China

We evaluate WRF 90 m wind speeds over Hami, China, using hourly observations from 12 towers during June 2016–May 2017. The study combines a tower-point seasonal hindcast, a four-model comparison at six WRF anchors, a bidirectional cross-farm evaluation, and monthly residual interpolation with 2016–2018 wind-power-density (WPD) scenarios. The March–May 2017 hindcast uses causal feature construction and training-period-only fitting on 26,367 matched tower-hour samples. Its two-stage ExtraTrees correction reduces central error relative to its power-law baseline but detects none of the 128 observed hours at or above 25 m−1, revealing substantial loss of the high-wind tail. In a separate leave-one-WRF-anchor-out comparison, ET, DLinear, TCN, and CVAE use identical 48 h power-law wind histories at the six anchors; their unweighted anchor mean RMSE values span 3.521–3.540 m−1 and all strongly underdetect 25 m−1 h. In the cross-farm evaluation, shared-anchor observations were excluded from fitting: all models predict zero of 223 YW exceedance hours when trained with BLK observations, while the reverse direction gives low and variable POD values. For the monthly product, all towers at a held WRF coordinate were excluded from IDW donors. Across six anchors and 72 anchor-month comparisons, the unweighted mean RMSE decreases from 1.04 to 0.77 m−1. The published power-2, fixed-density central WPD remains 726.7 W m−2; across 162 sensitivity cases varying IDW power, residual, cubic factor, density, and penalty weight, fixed-density and ISA means span 457.3–1102.5 and 411.0–988.5 W m−2, respectively. Only 8.36% of product cells lie inside the six-anchor convex hull. Together, these analyses distinguish tower-point prediction, monthly interpolation, and regional WPD comparison. The maps support regional comparison and identify locations for follow-up measurement within the one-year tower record and six-anchor network.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17090834
Primary Topic
Wind Energy Research and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Tower-Constrained Post-Processing of WRF Hub-Height Wind Speed for Regional Wind-Resource Screening in Hami, Xinjiang, China

Jie Ma, Nuochen Zhang, Fang Zhang, Lei Bai et al.
Atmosphere
Wind Energy Research and Development
article

Tower-Constrained Post-Processing of WRF Hub-Height Wind Speed for Regional Wind-Resource Screening in Hami, Xinjiang, China

Jie Ma, Nuochen Zhang, Fang Zhang, Lei Bai, Chenxiao Shi, Yufei Wang, Zilin Ren, Qian Li
article en

Abstract

We evaluate WRF 90 m wind speeds over Hami, China, using hourly observations from 12 towers during June 2016–May 2017. The study combines a tower-point seasonal hindcast, a four-model comparison at six WRF anchors, a bidirectional cross-farm evaluation, and monthly residual interpolation with 2016–2018 wind-power-density (WPD) scenarios. The March–May 2017 hindcast uses causal feature construction and training-period-only fitting on 26,367 matched tower-hour samples. Its two-stage ExtraTrees correction reduces central error relative to its power-law baseline but detects none of the 128 observed hours at or above 25 m−1, revealing substantial loss of the high-wind tail. In a separate leave-one-WRF-anchor-out comparison, ET, DLinear, TCN, and CVAE use identical 48 h power-law wind histories at the six anchors; their unweighted anchor mean RMSE values span 3.521–3.540 m−1 and all strongly underdetect 25 m−1 h. In the cross-farm evaluation, shared-anchor observations were excluded from fitting: all models predict zero of 223 YW exceedance hours when trained with BLK observations, while the reverse direction gives low and variable POD values. For the monthly product, all towers at a held WRF coordinate were excluded from IDW donors. Across six anchors and 72 anchor-month comparisons, the unweighted mean RMSE decreases from 1.04 to 0.77 m−1. The published power-2, fixed-density central WPD remains 726.7 W m−2; across 162 sensitivity cases varying IDW power, residual, cubic factor, density, and penalty weight, fixed-density and ISA means span 457.3–1102.5 and 411.0–988.5 W m−2, respectively. Only 8.36% of product cells lie inside the six-anchor convex hull. Together, these analyses distinguish tower-point prediction, monthly interpolation, and regional WPD comparison. The maps support regional comparison and identify locations for follow-up measurement within the one-year tower record and six-anchor network.

AtmosphereVol. 17(9)
Hebei University of Engineering (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hainan University (CN), Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography (CN), Hainan Meteorology Administration (CN)
Science and Technology Department of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Wind Energy Research and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.