Ground-shaking-informed regime partitioning for characterizing earthquake-induced secondary hazards

Abstract Background Earthquake-induced landslides and liquefaction often occur within the same seismic event but may be controlled by different combinations of ground shaking, topography, hydrology, site conditions, and tectonic setting. This study develops an interpretable remote-sensing framework to map and compare these secondary hazards after the 2025 Dingri Ms 6.8 earthquake in the southern Tibetan Plateau. Results Multi-source optical and SAR indicators, seismic variables, and geo-environmental factors were integrated using ensemble machine-learning models. A peak ground acceleration (PGA)-guided multivariate Gaussian mixture model was used to stratify hazard samples into PGA-associated statistical regimes, and regime-wise XGBoost models were interpreted using SHAP. The results show that landslide predictions are mainly associated with shaking intensity and topographic conditions, whereas liquefaction predictions show stronger regime-dependent associations with site conditions, hydrological proximity, geomorphic setting, and near-fault effects. Conclusions The proposed framework provides a practical way to compare model-inferred feature associations across different shaking and environmental backgrounds. The results highlight that coseismic secondary hazards in high-altitude tectonic regions are not governed by a single uniform relationship, but by spatially heterogeneous combinations of seismic and environmental conditions associated with hazard occurrence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoenvironmental Disasters
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-026-00405-4
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Ground-shaking-informed regime partitioning for characterizing earthquake-induced secondary hazards

Xie Hu, Yueren Xu, Feng Lin, Xiao Yu et al.
Geoenvironmental Disasters
Landslides and related hazards
article

Ground-shaking-informed regime partitioning for characterizing earthquake-induced secondary hazards

Xie Hu, Yueren Xu, Feng Lin, Xiao Yu, Ni An
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Earthquake-induced landslides and liquefaction often occur within the same seismic event but may be controlled by different combinations of ground shaking, topography, hydrology, site conditions, and tectonic setting. This study develops an interpretable remote-sensing framework to map and compare these secondary hazards after the 2025 Dingri Ms 6.8 earthquake in the southern Tibetan Plateau. Results Multi-source optical and SAR indicators, seismic variables, and geo-environmental factors were integrated using ensemble machine-learning models. A peak ground acceleration (PGA)-guided multivariate Gaussian mixture model was used to stratify hazard samples into PGA-associated statistical regimes, and regime-wise XGBoost models were interpreted using SHAP. The results show that landslide predictions are mainly associated with shaking intensity and topographic conditions, whereas liquefaction predictions show stronger regime-dependent associations with site conditions, hydrological proximity, geomorphic setting, and near-fault effects. Conclusions The proposed framework provides a practical way to compare model-inferred feature associations across different shaking and environmental backgrounds. The results highlight that coseismic secondary hazards in high-altitude tectonic regions are not governed by a single uniform relationship, but by spatially heterogeneous combinations of seismic and environmental conditions associated with hazard occurrence.

Geoenvironmental DisastersVol. 13(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Ministry of Education (RO), Beijing Urban Systems Engineering Research Center (CN), Illinois Archaeological Survey (US), Zhejiang University (CN), China Earthquake Administration (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.