Optical Astrometry and Radar Ranging in Earth–Moon Tracking Geometry for Cislunar Orbit Determination of Non-Cooperative Targets

Precise orbit determination of non-cooperative cislunar objects requires measurements that do not depend on onboard transponders or retroreflectors. This study evaluates whether optical astrometry and radar echo range can provide useful tracking performance in a two-station Earth–Moon geometry. Three configurations were tested with weighted batch least-squares estimation in the SPOT orbit-determination toolkit. Configuration A used Earth optical astrometry and Earth radar range. Configuration B added lunar optical astrometry, and Configuration C added lunar radar range. The targets were an Earth–Moon L4 case, a low circular lunar orbit, a highly elliptical lunar orbit, and an Apophis close-approach reference arc. The Earth-only baseline converged for all targets, but the benefit of a lunar station depended strongly on target distance and geometry. Lunar optical was most effective for the two lunar orbiters. Lunar radar range was most effective for distant geometries. The preferred lunar-station observable is therefore not universal. It depends on station–target distance, target dynamics, and parameter correlation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solar System Research
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0038094626600563
Primary Topic
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optical Astrometry and Radar Ranging in Earth–Moon Tracking Geometry for Cislunar Orbit Determination of Non-Cooperative Targets

Jianguo Yan, 吕润松, Gao Wutong, Zhenqi Wang et al.
Solar System Research
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
article

Optical Astrometry and Radar Ranging in Earth–Moon Tracking Geometry for Cislunar Orbit Determination of Non-Cooperative Targets

Jianguo Yan, 吕润松, Gao Wutong, Zhenqi Wang, Harold Ulotu, Jean-Pierre Barriot
article en

Abstract

Precise orbit determination of non-cooperative cislunar objects requires measurements that do not depend on onboard transponders or retroreflectors. This study evaluates whether optical astrometry and radar echo range can provide useful tracking performance in a two-station Earth–Moon geometry. Three configurations were tested with weighted batch least-squares estimation in the SPOT orbit-determination toolkit. Configuration A used Earth optical astrometry and Earth radar range. Configuration B added lunar optical astrometry, and Configuration C added lunar radar range. The targets were an Earth–Moon L4 case, a low circular lunar orbit, a highly elliptical lunar orbit, and an Apophis close-approach reference arc. The Earth-only baseline converged for all targets, but the benefit of a lunar station depended strongly on target distance and geometry. Lunar optical was most effective for the two lunar orbiters. Lunar radar range was most effective for distant geometries. The preferred lunar-station observable is therefore not universal. It depends on station–target distance, target dynamics, and parameter correlation.

Solar System ResearchVol. 60(5)
Wuhan University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying Mapping and Remote Sensing (CN), University of French Polynesia (PF)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.