5 A multivariate plasma biomarker model enabling safe exclusion of glioblastoma

Abstract Introduction Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor and remains difficult to diagnose due to reliance on MRI and invasive biopsies, which are limited by accessibility, morbidity, and radiologic uncertainty. Blood-based biomarkers may provide a minimally-invasive strategy to support early diagnostic-triage. Methods In this retrospective case-control study, plasma samples from 72 patients with newly-diagnosed GBM and 102 age-matched healthy controls were analyzed. Seven circulating proteins were quantified using ultrasensitive- and clinical-grade immunoassays: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NfL), tau, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and polymorphonuclear-(PMN) elastase. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis. Multivariate logistic regression with 10-fold cross-validation and 1,000-iteration bootstrap resampling evaluated model robustness, with emphasis on sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for exclusion-use. Results Among individual plasma biomarkers, GFAP demonstrated near-perfect separation between GBM and controls (AUC = 0.995), followed by NfL (AUC = 0.957), whereas tau, NSE, MPO, and PMN-elastase showed more modest individual performance. A multivariate logistic regression model integrating GFAP, NfL, tau, NSE, MPO, and PMN-elastase achieved near-perfect classification of GBM-versus-controls (AUC = 0.999), outperforming all individual biomarkers. At the optimal probability threshold, sensitivity reached 98.6% with 100% specificity, with no GBM cases misclassified as negative. Ten-fold cross-validation yielded a mean AUC of 0.984 with consistently high-sensitivity and specificity across folds, indicating minimal overfitting. Bootstrap resampling (1,000-iterations) confirmed stability of discriminative performance. When extrapolated to population-level prevalence, the model maintained an extremely high NPV (>0.999), while PPV remained low, consistent with its intended role as a high-sensitivity exclusion tool rather than a confirmatory test. Conclusion A plasma-based multivariate biomarker model enables accurate, safe exclusion of glioblastoma and supports diagnostic triage alongside neuro-imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noag172.008
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

5 A multivariate plasma biomarker model enabling safe exclusion of glioblastoma

Julien Favresse, Mattéo Riva, Fabienne George, Lionel D’hondt et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

5 A multivariate plasma biomarker model enabling safe exclusion of glioblastoma

Julien Favresse, Mattéo Riva, Fabienne George, Lionel D’hondt, Clara David, M Julien Cabo, M Jonathan Decarpentrie, Jonathan Douxfils
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor and remains difficult to diagnose due to reliance on MRI and invasive biopsies, which are limited by accessibility, morbidity, and radiologic uncertainty. Blood-based biomarkers may provide a minimally-invasive strategy to support early diagnostic-triage. Methods In this retrospective case-control study, plasma samples from 72 patients with newly-diagnosed GBM and 102 age-matched healthy controls were analyzed. Seven circulating proteins were quantified using ultrasensitive- and clinical-grade immunoassays: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NfL), tau, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and polymorphonuclear-(PMN) elastase. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis. Multivariate logistic regression with 10-fold cross-validation and 1,000-iteration bootstrap resampling evaluated model robustness, with emphasis on sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for exclusion-use. Results Among individual plasma biomarkers, GFAP demonstrated near-perfect separation between GBM and controls (AUC = 0.995), followed by NfL (AUC = 0.957), whereas tau, NSE, MPO, and PMN-elastase showed more modest individual performance. A multivariate logistic regression model integrating GFAP, NfL, tau, NSE, MPO, and PMN-elastase achieved near-perfect classification of GBM-versus-controls (AUC = 0.999), outperforming all individual biomarkers. At the optimal probability threshold, sensitivity reached 98.6% with 100% specificity, with no GBM cases misclassified as negative. Ten-fold cross-validation yielded a mean AUC of 0.984 with consistently high-sensitivity and specificity across folds, indicating minimal overfitting. Bootstrap resampling (1,000-iterations) confirmed stability of discriminative performance. When extrapolated to population-level prevalence, the model maintained an extremely high NPV (>0.999), while PPV remained low, consistent with its intended role as a high-sensitivity exclusion tool rather than a confirmatory test. Conclusion A plasma-based multivariate biomarker model enables accurate, safe exclusion of glioblastoma and supports diagnostic triage alongside neuro-imaging.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 28(Supplement_1)
University of Namur (BE), Comagine Health (US), Clinique Saint-Joseph (BE), UCLouvain (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.