Generalized Matched Filtering for Improving Seismic Section Clarity: Incorporating Frequency‐Based Regularization

ABSTRACT Seismic data resolution is crucial for subsurface imaging. But factors such as the finite bandwidth of seismic sources, wavelet interference and noise often degrade the clarity of reflectors, making their detection challenging. Although recent advances in seismic data processing methods have shown promise in enhancing resolution, they remain limited by underlying physical constraints and inherent assumptions. In contrast, matched filtering, a physics‐based signal‐processing technique, can enhance the detectability of known waveforms by maximizing the signal‐to‐noise ratio. In this article, the source wavelet is first approximated using Wiener inverse filtering, followed by blue reflectivity modifications consisting of amplitude compensation of 3 dB/octave and a + π /4 phase correction. After applying the proposed generalized matched filter (GMF), an additional + π /2 phase correction is introduced as a direct consequence of the derivation, ensuring proper phase alignment. Unlike conventional matched filtering, which is designed for isolated reflectors, the GMF developed in this study explicitly incorporates the thin‐layer response by modifying the original matched‐filter equation. This modification represents a key novelty of the study, as it enables the filter to account for the differential effects of the seismic wavelet. To stabilize the results and suppress noise amplification, frequency‐based regularization differentiation is applied. The proposed GMF workflow is validated using stationary and non‐stationary synthetic examples as well as a field seismic dataset. The results demonstrate improved thin‐bed resolution and reflector coherence through wavelet compression and phase correction within the available frequency bandwidth, rather than through artificial spectral broadening. Quantitative analyses based on side‐lobe energy ratio (SLER), power spectral density (PSD), tuning‐thickness measurements and seismic coherence demonstrate that GMF enhances seismic interpretation while preserving the spectral characteristics of the original data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Prospecting
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.70254
Primary Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalized Matched Filtering for Improving Seismic Section Clarity: Incorporating Frequency‐Based Regularization

Amin Kahrizi
Geophysical Prospecting
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
article

Generalized Matched Filtering for Improving Seismic Section Clarity: Incorporating Frequency‐Based Regularization

Amin Kahrizi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Seismic data resolution is crucial for subsurface imaging. But factors such as the finite bandwidth of seismic sources, wavelet interference and noise often degrade the clarity of reflectors, making their detection challenging. Although recent advances in seismic data processing methods have shown promise in enhancing resolution, they remain limited by underlying physical constraints and inherent assumptions. In contrast, matched filtering, a physics‐based signal‐processing technique, can enhance the detectability of known waveforms by maximizing the signal‐to‐noise ratio. In this article, the source wavelet is first approximated using Wiener inverse filtering, followed by blue reflectivity modifications consisting of amplitude compensation of 3 dB/octave and a + π /4 phase correction. After applying the proposed generalized matched filter (GMF), an additional + π /2 phase correction is introduced as a direct consequence of the derivation, ensuring proper phase alignment. Unlike conventional matched filtering, which is designed for isolated reflectors, the GMF developed in this study explicitly incorporates the thin‐layer response by modifying the original matched‐filter equation. This modification represents a key novelty of the study, as it enables the filter to account for the differential effects of the seismic wavelet. To stabilize the results and suppress noise amplification, frequency‐based regularization differentiation is applied. The proposed GMF workflow is validated using stationary and non‐stationary synthetic examples as well as a field seismic dataset. The results demonstrate improved thin‐bed resolution and reflector coherence through wavelet compression and phase correction within the available frequency bandwidth, rather than through artificial spectral broadening. Quantitative analyses based on side‐lobe energy ratio (SLER), power spectral density (PSD), tuning‐thickness measurements and seismic coherence demonstrate that GMF enhances seismic interpretation while preserving the spectral characteristics of the original data.

Geophysical ProspectingVol. 74(7)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Laboratoire de Géologie de l’École Normale Supérieure (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.