Data Unification, Marginalised Groups and Diminished Experience in AI-Supported Education

This article extends a prior classroom simulation of cumulative educational disadvantage into the artificial intelligence context. The earlier model showed that students with unstable home lives were left behind by ordinary school events because the events rewarded hidden stability. This paper argues that AI-supported education can reproduce the same structure at the level of data, representation, access and recognition. Large language models and educational AI tools may not deliberately exclude marginalised students, but systems trained and designed around dominant data environments can diminish the experience of groups whose languages, cultures, disabilities, religions, geographies, family obligations and practical knowledge are less represented. The article identifies marginalised student groups likely to experience diminished AI support and proposes classroom and policy safeguards. It argues that AI equity requires more than access to devices; it requires recognition of whose lives, values and knowledge are assumed by the system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22121526
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Data Unification, Marginalised Groups and Diminished Experience in AI-Supported Education

Greg Adamson
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Data Unification, Marginalised Groups and Diminished Experience in AI-Supported Education

Greg Adamson
preprint en

Abstract

This article extends a prior classroom simulation of cumulative educational disadvantage into the artificial intelligence context. The earlier model showed that students with unstable home lives were left behind by ordinary school events because the events rewarded hidden stability. This paper argues that AI-supported education can reproduce the same structure at the level of data, representation, access and recognition. Large language models and educational AI tools may not deliberately exclude marginalised students, but systems trained and designed around dominant data environments can diminish the experience of groups whose languages, cultures, disabilities, religions, geographies, family obligations and practical knowledge are less represented. The article identifies marginalised student groups likely to experience diminished AI support and proposes classroom and policy safeguards. It argues that AI equity requires more than access to devices; it requires recognition of whose lives, values and knowledge are assumed by the system.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.