Contract labor costs and financial performance at high and low surgical volume hospitals

BACKGROUND: Rising labor costs negatively impact hospitals' financial stability. Poor hospital financial performance raises the probability of bankruptcy and closure, which limits patients' access to critically important medical and surgical care. The objective of the study was to determine the association between contract labor costs and hospital financial performance and examine if this relationship is modified by surgical volume. METHODS: We used data from the National Academy for State Health Policy, the American Hospital Association, and the RAND Corporation to analyze general and financial characteristics of U.S. hospitals. The primary outcomes were hospital operating margin, total margin, and financial distress. Generalized estimating equations were used to identify associations between contract labor costs and financial performance. RESULTS: Our sample included 22,366 hospital-year observations from 2,914 hospitals. Higher contract labor costs were associated with lower operating margins (coefficient -0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.17 to -0.10; p < 0.001), lower total margins (coefficient -0.11, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.07; p < 0.001), and higher financial distress (odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02; p = 0.003). High surgical volume was associated with higher operating margins (coefficient 1.40, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.95; p < 0.001), higher total margins (coefficient 1.62, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.12; p < 0.001), and a lower risk of financial distress (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.94; p = 0.008) compared to low surgical volume. The interaction term for contract labor costs and high-volume status was not statistically significant for operating margin (coefficient -0.02, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.05; p = 0.605), total margin (coefficient -0.04, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.02; p = 0.179), or financial distress (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.03; p = 0.303). CONCLUSIONS: Higher contract labor costs were associated with lower hospital profit margins. High surgical volume may not offer financial protection against the economic challenge of contract labor costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356994
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contract labor costs and financial performance at high and low surgical volume hospitals

Samuel Enumah, Xueya Cai, Xue Wu, Yue Li
PLoS ONE
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Contract labor costs and financial performance at high and low surgical volume hospitals

Samuel Enumah, Xueya Cai, Xue Wu, Yue Li
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rising labor costs negatively impact hospitals' financial stability. Poor hospital financial performance raises the probability of bankruptcy and closure, which limits patients' access to critically important medical and surgical care. The objective of the study was to determine the association between contract labor costs and hospital financial performance and examine if this relationship is modified by surgical volume. METHODS: We used data from the National Academy for State Health Policy, the American Hospital Association, and the RAND Corporation to analyze general and financial characteristics of U.S. hospitals. The primary outcomes were hospital operating margin, total margin, and financial distress. Generalized estimating equations were used to identify associations between contract labor costs and financial performance. RESULTS: Our sample included 22,366 hospital-year observations from 2,914 hospitals. Higher contract labor costs were associated with lower operating margins (coefficient -0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.17 to -0.10; p < 0.001), lower total margins (coefficient -0.11, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.07; p < 0.001), and higher financial distress (odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02; p = 0.003). High surgical volume was associated with higher operating margins (coefficient 1.40, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.95; p < 0.001), higher total margins (coefficient 1.62, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.12; p < 0.001), and a lower risk of financial distress (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.94; p = 0.008) compared to low surgical volume. The interaction term for contract labor costs and high-volume status was not statistically significant for operating margin (coefficient -0.02, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.05; p = 0.605), total margin (coefficient -0.04, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.02; p = 0.179), or financial distress (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.03; p = 0.303). CONCLUSIONS: Higher contract labor costs were associated with lower hospital profit margins. High surgical volume may not offer financial protection against the economic challenge of contract labor costs.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(8)
University of Rochester Medical Center (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.