Enhancing Mentorship in Plastic Surgery Through an Algorithmic, Team-Based Approach
Mentorship is a cornerstone of surgical education, fostering professional growth, research productivity, and career guidance. In plastic surgery, mentorship profoundly impacts career choices and professional development, yet structured one-on-one programs are notably limited. Challenges such as time constraints, mismatched expectations, and disparities in representation often hinder traditional mentorship models. To address these issues, we developed a computational algorithm to facilitate team-based mentorship in plastic surgery. This algorithm utilizes a weighted Jaccard similarity index and recursive stability optimization to optimize compatibility among participants by aligning career goals, clinical interests, and mentorship priorities. A survey of 171 Professional Resource Opportunities in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Education and Leadership (PROPEL) members informed the pilot matching process, resulting in 36 teams with a median pooled similarity score of 0.823. Our approach offers distinct advantages, including equitable opportunity, scalability, and reduced administrative burden. Future efforts should focus on integrating qualitative feedback, evaluating long-term outcomes, and exploring advanced technologies such as natural language processing to refine the model further.
Authors
- Coral Katave
- Kavitha Ranganathan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8307-9089)
- Anam N. Ehsan
- Angela Oswald
- Zachary Eisner
Institutions
- University of Southern California (US)
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- American Society of Plastic Surgeons (US)
- Michigan Medicine (US)
- Ann Arbor Center for Independent Living (US)
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2026-08-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000013414
- Primary Topic
- Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00