Translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index into Finnish

Shoulder pain is a leading cause of disability, often resulting in functional limitations and reduced quality of life. Valid, culturally adapted patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential for assessing symptoms and treatment outcomes across populations. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is widely used internationally, but no validated Finnish version has been available. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically validate a Finnish version of the SPADI for use in Finnish-speaking patients with shoulder pain. Translation followed International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines, including forward and back translation, expert review, and cognitive debriefing with 10 patients. Psychometric validation was conducted in 179 patients at Helsinki University Hospital; 137 also completed retest assessments after 12–21 days. We evaluated internal consistency, test–retest reliability, factor structure, floor and ceiling effects, and convergent validity using Cronbach’s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), exploratory factor analysis, and predefined hypothesis testing based on Pearson correlations with other PROMs: QuickDASH, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant-Murley Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST). The Finnish SPADI demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.96) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.91). Pain (α = 0.93; ICC = 0.89) and disability (α = 0.94; ICC = 0.89) subscales were similarly robust. No floor or ceiling effects were observed for total scores, although several disability items showed ceiling effects. Convergent validity was strong, with high correlations between SPADI and QuickDASH (r = 0.85), OSS (r = 0.88), Constant-Murley (r = 0.83), ASES (r = 0.80), and SST (r = 0.81) scores, confirming all predefined hypotheses. Factor analysis supported a two-dimensional structure separating pain and disability. The Finnish SPADI exhibits strong linguistic validity and excellent psychometric properties, providing a reliable tool for assessing shoulder pain and disability in Finnish-speaking populations. Study registration: 26 October 2022 at Clinical trials (NCT05598541).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-68037-0
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index into Finnish

Mikko Salmela, Antti P. Launonen, Simo Taimela, Pirjo Toivonen et al.
Scientific Reports
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index into Finnish

Mikko Salmela, Antti P. Launonen, Simo Taimela, Pirjo Toivonen, Teppo L. N. Järvinen, Karin Sallmén, Lauri Kavaja, Lasse Rämö, Thomas Ibounig, Eerik Hällfors, Robert Björkenheim, Saara Raatikainen, Juha Paloneva, Sami Elamo, Tuomas Lähdeoja, Jussi P. Repo, Sanni Toivonen, Kirsi Nyrhinen
article en

Abstract

Shoulder pain is a leading cause of disability, often resulting in functional limitations and reduced quality of life. Valid, culturally adapted patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential for assessing symptoms and treatment outcomes across populations. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is widely used internationally, but no validated Finnish version has been available. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically validate a Finnish version of the SPADI for use in Finnish-speaking patients with shoulder pain. Translation followed International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines, including forward and back translation, expert review, and cognitive debriefing with 10 patients. Psychometric validation was conducted in 179 patients at Helsinki University Hospital; 137 also completed retest assessments after 12–21 days. We evaluated internal consistency, test–retest reliability, factor structure, floor and ceiling effects, and convergent validity using Cronbach’s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), exploratory factor analysis, and predefined hypothesis testing based on Pearson correlations with other PROMs: QuickDASH, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant-Murley Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST). The Finnish SPADI demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.96) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.91). Pain (α = 0.93; ICC = 0.89) and disability (α = 0.94; ICC = 0.89) subscales were similarly robust. No floor or ceiling effects were observed for total scores, although several disability items showed ceiling effects. Convergent validity was strong, with high correlations between SPADI and QuickDASH (r = 0.85), OSS (r = 0.88), Constant-Murley (r = 0.83), ASES (r = 0.80), and SST (r = 0.81) scores, confirming all predefined hypotheses. Factor analysis supported a two-dimensional structure separating pain and disability. The Finnish SPADI exhibits strong linguistic validity and excellent psychometric properties, providing a reliable tool for assessing shoulder pain and disability in Finnish-speaking populations. Study registration: 26 October 2022 at Clinical trials (NCT05598541).

Scientific Reports
University of Helsinki (FI), Oulu University Hospital (FI), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Häme University of Applied Sciences (FI), Kanta-Hämeen Keskussairaala (FI), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Tampere University (FI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.