Taking Stock: Assessing Animal Welfare in South African Captive Lion Tourism Venues

South Africa maintains thousands of captive lions and other felids in commercial captive wildlife facilities. Despite ongoing debate regarding the welfare implications of this industry, empirical assessments of welfare conditions remain limited. This study conducted a baseline assessment of welfare and husbandry conditions in public-facing captive lion venues in South Africa. A welfare assessment framework was applied across 34 tourism venues in Gauteng, Free State, Limpopo and North West provinces. Ten welfare indices were evaluated: mobility, environmental noise quality, shelter, hygiene, naturalness, social interaction, enrichment, diet quality, entertainment intensity, and animal management. Assessments were conducted using covert participant observation. Relationships between welfare scores, entry price and the provision of animal–visitor interactions (AVIs) were subsequently examined. A total of 627 lions were recorded across the 34 venues. No venue achieved high welfare scores across all indices, and welfare conditions were predominantly intermediate. Hygiene and environmental noise quality received the highest welfare scores, whereas animal management, enrichment, entertainment intensity and naturalness received the lowest. Recurring welfare concerns included restricted enclosure sizes, limited environmental complexity, inadequate shelter and retreat opportunities, inconsistent feeding practices, poor water quality, premature cub separation and intensive AVIs. Welfare scores were significantly higher at venues that prohibit AVIs than at venues offering such experiences. This study provides a standardised assessment of welfare conditions in South Africa’s captive lion tourism sector and contributes empirical evidence to the ongoing discussions regarding the regulation and future management of the industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16172683
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taking Stock: Assessing Animal Welfare in South African Captive Lion Tourism Venues

Alexandra K. Schnell, Louise de Waal, Angie Elwin, Stephanie-Emmy Klarmann et al.
Animals
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Taking Stock: Assessing Animal Welfare in South African Captive Lion Tourism Venues

Alexandra K. Schnell, Louise de Waal, Angie Elwin, Stephanie-Emmy Klarmann, Neil D'Cruze, Tom Moorhouse
article en

Abstract

South Africa maintains thousands of captive lions and other felids in commercial captive wildlife facilities. Despite ongoing debate regarding the welfare implications of this industry, empirical assessments of welfare conditions remain limited. This study conducted a baseline assessment of welfare and husbandry conditions in public-facing captive lion venues in South Africa. A welfare assessment framework was applied across 34 tourism venues in Gauteng, Free State, Limpopo and North West provinces. Ten welfare indices were evaluated: mobility, environmental noise quality, shelter, hygiene, naturalness, social interaction, enrichment, diet quality, entertainment intensity, and animal management. Assessments were conducted using covert participant observation. Relationships between welfare scores, entry price and the provision of animal–visitor interactions (AVIs) were subsequently examined. A total of 627 lions were recorded across the 34 venues. No venue achieved high welfare scores across all indices, and welfare conditions were predominantly intermediate. Hygiene and environmental noise quality received the highest welfare scores, whereas animal management, enrichment, entertainment intensity and naturalness received the lowest. Recurring welfare concerns included restricted enclosure sizes, limited environmental complexity, inadequate shelter and retreat opportunities, inconsistent feeding practices, poor water quality, premature cub separation and intensive AVIs. Welfare scores were significantly higher at venues that prohibit AVIs than at venues offering such experiences. This study provides a standardised assessment of welfare conditions in South Africa’s captive lion tourism sector and contributes empirical evidence to the ongoing discussions regarding the regulation and future management of the industry.

AnimalsVol. 16(17)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), University of Johannesburg (ZA), University of Cambridge (GB), South African National Blood Service (ZA), University of Oxford (GB), Organisation Mondiale de la Santé Animale (FR)
World Animal Protection
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.