Anomaly Detection With an Expanded Standardized First-Trimester Fetal Anatomic Ultrasound Screening Protocol

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of a novel comprehensive StaFFAUS (standardized first-trimester fetal anatomic ultrasound screening) protocol. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included pregnant patients undergoing first-trimester ultrasound screening at 11 6/7-13 6/7 weeks of gestation between 2013 and 2024. Identification of gold-standard-confirmed anomalies was assessed retrospectively according to an expanded first-trimester screening protocol with 30 imaging planes called StaFFAUS, the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) Minimum-Requirement, and the ISUOG Detailed protocols. Diagnostic performance was evaluated in a subset validation cohort made up of all fetuses with structural abnormalities and a control group without structural abnormalities, selected at a 1:3 ratio. Examination time was assessed in 100 randomly selected scans. Pairwise DeLong comparisons were used to compare the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) between groups. RESULTS: A total of 18,250 women carrying 19,417 fetuses were considered for inclusion. First-trimester screening identified 246 fetuses with structural abnormalities, comprising 580 individual detected anomalies (3.0%). Using 694 gold-standard-confirmed anomalies as the reference standard, StaFFAUS achieved a significantly higher anomaly-level detection rate than the ISUOG Detailed protocol (83.6% vs 67.3%, P<.001) and the ISUOG Minimum-Requirement protocol (83.6% vs 47.7%, P<.001). In the diagnostic performance cohort of 326 fetuses with anomalies and 978 fetuses in a matched control group (N=1,304), StaFFAUS showed the highest sensitivity (75.5%), accuracy (90.8%), and AUROC (0.857, 95% CI, 0.830-0.884), whereas the ISUOG Minimum-Requirement protocol achieved the highest specificity (99.0%). The AUROC of StaFFAUS was significantly higher than those of both the ISUOG Detailed (AUROC 0.820, P<.001) and ISUOG Minimum-Requirement (AUROC 0.769, P<.001) protocols. Median examination time was 28 minutes (interquartile range 22-35.5 minutes). CONCLUSION: Compared with current ISUOG first-trimester screening protocols, StaFFAUS demonstrated superior anomaly detection and diagnostic performance. As an expanded standardized screening framework incorporating additional first-trimester anatomic views, it improves early detection of fetal structural abnormalities while remaining clinically feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006413
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anomaly Detection With an Expanded Standardized First-Trimester Fetal Anatomic Ultrasound Screening Protocol

謝若蘭, 刘春霞, Peixin Chen, Hui Chen et al.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Anomaly Detection With an Expanded Standardized First-Trimester Fetal Anatomic Ultrasound Screening Protocol

謝若蘭, 刘春霞, Peixin Chen, Hui Chen, Lanting Huang, Yunhan Jiang, Na Di, Guoqing Du, Shen Zhang, Yue Jie, Baoming Luo, Zhenhua Wang
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of a novel comprehensive StaFFAUS (standardized first-trimester fetal anatomic ultrasound screening) protocol. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included pregnant patients undergoing first-trimester ultrasound screening at 11 6/7-13 6/7 weeks of gestation between 2013 and 2024. Identification of gold-standard-confirmed anomalies was assessed retrospectively according to an expanded first-trimester screening protocol with 30 imaging planes called StaFFAUS, the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) Minimum-Requirement, and the ISUOG Detailed protocols. Diagnostic performance was evaluated in a subset validation cohort made up of all fetuses with structural abnormalities and a control group without structural abnormalities, selected at a 1:3 ratio. Examination time was assessed in 100 randomly selected scans. Pairwise DeLong comparisons were used to compare the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) between groups. RESULTS: A total of 18,250 women carrying 19,417 fetuses were considered for inclusion. First-trimester screening identified 246 fetuses with structural abnormalities, comprising 580 individual detected anomalies (3.0%). Using 694 gold-standard-confirmed anomalies as the reference standard, StaFFAUS achieved a significantly higher anomaly-level detection rate than the ISUOG Detailed protocol (83.6% vs 67.3%, P<.001) and the ISUOG Minimum-Requirement protocol (83.6% vs 47.7%, P<.001). In the diagnostic performance cohort of 326 fetuses with anomalies and 978 fetuses in a matched control group (N=1,304), StaFFAUS showed the highest sensitivity (75.5%), accuracy (90.8%), and AUROC (0.857, 95% CI, 0.830-0.884), whereas the ISUOG Minimum-Requirement protocol achieved the highest specificity (99.0%). The AUROC of StaFFAUS was significantly higher than those of both the ISUOG Detailed (AUROC 0.820, P<.001) and ISUOG Minimum-Requirement (AUROC 0.769, P<.001) protocols. Median examination time was 28 minutes (interquartile range 22-35.5 minutes). CONCLUSION: Compared with current ISUOG first-trimester screening protocols, StaFFAUS demonstrated superior anomaly detection and diagnostic performance. As an expanded standardized screening framework incorporating additional first-trimester anatomic views, it improves early detection of fetal structural abnormalities while remaining clinically feasible.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.