The limitations of radiological protection in the Fukushima nuclear accident from the citizens’ perspectives: towards a revision of the general recommendations

The aim of this research is to identify the radiological protection problems after the Fukushima accident from the citizens’ perspective and to clarify the major points which should be included in the revised General Recommendations. As research methods, both qualitative and quantitative methods were employed to clarify the damage to residents in and outside of Fukushima Prefecture. For these reasons, we critically review the description of the ICRP Publication 146 Annex B Fukushima nuclear accident (Annex B. The Fukushima Nuclear Accident). Our team includes researchers who were affected by the disaster directly; their personal experiences were also reflected. Through this research, important insights of affected citizens missed in ICRP Publication 146 were obtained. ICRP Publication 146 and the General Recommendation should be revised to address these issues pointed out by the affected population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the ICRP
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01466453251412085
Primary Topic
Radioactive contamination and transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The limitations of radiological protection in the Fukushima nuclear accident from the citizens’ perspectives: towards a revision of the general recommendations

Y. Hamaoka, S. Goto, A. Akechi, N. Shimizu
Annals of the ICRP
Radioactive contamination and transfer
article

The limitations of radiological protection in the Fukushima nuclear accident from the citizens’ perspectives: towards a revision of the general recommendations

Y. Hamaoka, S. Goto, A. Akechi, N. Shimizu
article en

Abstract

The aim of this research is to identify the radiological protection problems after the Fukushima accident from the citizens’ perspective and to clarify the major points which should be included in the revised General Recommendations. As research methods, both qualitative and quantitative methods were employed to clarify the damage to residents in and outside of Fukushima Prefecture. For these reasons, we critically review the description of the ICRP Publication 146 Annex B Fukushima nuclear accident (Annex B. The Fukushima Nuclear Accident). Our team includes researchers who were affected by the disaster directly; their personal experiences were also reflected. Through this research, important insights of affected citizens missed in ICRP Publication 146 were obtained. ICRP Publication 146 and the General Recommendation should be revised to address these issues pointed out by the affected population.

Annals of the ICRP
Kyoto Prefectural University (JP), Keio University (JP), Utsunomiya University (JP), Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (JP), Fukushima University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radioactive contamination and transfer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.