Treatment Sequencing of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Bone-Only Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Multi-Center Real-World Data Revealing a Numerical Trend Favoring Later-Line Use

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy represent the gold standard in the first-line treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the optimal timing of CDK4/6i initiation in patients with bone-only disease (BoD) remains a matter of clinical discussion. This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the impact of CDK4/6i treatment line (first-line vs. second-or-later-line) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in HR+/HER2− MBC patients with BoD. Methods: A total of 282 HR+/HER2− MBC patients with radiologically confirmed BoD treated across five tertiary academic centers were analyzed. All patients received bone-modifying agents (zoledronic acid or denosumab). Patients were categorized into Group 1 (first-line CDK4/6i, n = 193) and Group 2 (second-or-later-line CDK4/6i, n = 89). Baseline characteristics were recorded. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for key clinicopathological variables. Results: The median PFS was 30.193 months in the first-line group and 19.253 months in the second/later-line group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.055). The median OS was 62.324 months in the first-line group and 72.00 months in the second/later-line group, which was significant in the univariate analysis (p = 0.036). However, this significance was not maintained in the multivariate analysis adjusting for potential confounders (p = 0.487). Except for strong ER positivity, baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. In the multivariate analysis, no clinical factor, including treatment line, independently and significantly impacted OS. Conclusions: In HR+/HER2− MBC patients with bone-only disease, first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy demonstrates a trend toward superior PFS. After correcting for key observational biases, the later line of therapy does not independently alter OS. These findings reinforce that first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy remains the definitive standard of care, and later-line initiation should be reserved solely for select clinical scenarios where first-line use was not feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18172783
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment Sequencing of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Bone-Only Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Multi-Center Real-World Data Revealing a Numerical Trend Favoring Later-Line Use

Cengiz Yılmaz, Serkan Yıldırım, Murat Araz, Erhan Gökmen et al.
Cancers
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Treatment Sequencing of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Bone-Only Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Multi-Center Real-World Data Revealing a Numerical Trend Favoring Later-Line Use

Cengiz Yılmaz, Serkan Yıldırım, Murat Araz, Erhan Gökmen, Ece Şahin Hafızoğlu, Büşra Bülbül, Bekir Ucun, İrem Turgut Yeğen, Ahmet Oruc, Orhan Önder Eren, Atike Pınar Erdoğan
article en

Abstract

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy represent the gold standard in the first-line treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the optimal timing of CDK4/6i initiation in patients with bone-only disease (BoD) remains a matter of clinical discussion. This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the impact of CDK4/6i treatment line (first-line vs. second-or-later-line) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in HR+/HER2− MBC patients with BoD. Methods: A total of 282 HR+/HER2− MBC patients with radiologically confirmed BoD treated across five tertiary academic centers were analyzed. All patients received bone-modifying agents (zoledronic acid or denosumab). Patients were categorized into Group 1 (first-line CDK4/6i, n = 193) and Group 2 (second-or-later-line CDK4/6i, n = 89). Baseline characteristics were recorded. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for key clinicopathological variables. Results: The median PFS was 30.193 months in the first-line group and 19.253 months in the second/later-line group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.055). The median OS was 62.324 months in the first-line group and 72.00 months in the second/later-line group, which was significant in the univariate analysis (p = 0.036). However, this significance was not maintained in the multivariate analysis adjusting for potential confounders (p = 0.487). Except for strong ER positivity, baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. In the multivariate analysis, no clinical factor, including treatment line, independently and significantly impacted OS. Conclusions: In HR+/HER2− MBC patients with bone-only disease, first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy demonstrates a trend toward superior PFS. After correcting for key observational biases, the later line of therapy does not independently alter OS. These findings reinforce that first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy remains the definitive standard of care, and later-line initiation should be reserved solely for select clinical scenarios where first-line use was not feasible.

CancersVol. 18(17)
Izmir University (TR), Selçuk University (TR), Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR), Ege University (TR), Necmettin Erbakan University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.