Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Cardiomyopathies: A Comparative Synthesis of Guidelines and Consensus Documents

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in cardiomyopathies remains challenging because arrhythmic risk, drug efficacy, and pro-arrhythmic vulnerability vary substantially across phenotypes. This review summarizes contemporary guideline and consensus recommendations on antiarrhythmic drug use in hypertrophic, dilated, non-dilated left ventricular, and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent guidelines increasingly emphasize phenotype-oriented arrhythmia management, but specific recommendations for antiarrhythmic drug therapy remain fragmented. Beta-blockers and amiodarone are the most consistently recommended agents in structural heart disease, whereas class I drugs are generally restricted. Evidence is strongest for hypertrophic and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, while recommendations for dilated and non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathies are largely extrapolated from broader heart failure populations. Antiarrhythmic drugs are mainly used to reduce arrhythmic burden, symptoms, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies rather than to improve survival. Future studies should define phenotype-specific strategies based on ventricular function, myocardial scar, genotype, and clinical context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Cardiology Reports
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-026-02405-0
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Cardiomyopathies: A Comparative Synthesis of Guidelines and Consensus Documents

R Magnano, Giulia Renda, Andrea Palermi, D Rossi et al.
Current Cardiology Reports
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
article

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Cardiomyopathies: A Comparative Synthesis of Guidelines and Consensus Documents

R Magnano, Giulia Renda, Andrea Palermi, D Rossi, Massimo Di Marco, Silvio Saraullo, Sabina Gallina, Marco Merlo, Laura Pezzi, Gianfranco Sinagra
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in cardiomyopathies remains challenging because arrhythmic risk, drug efficacy, and pro-arrhythmic vulnerability vary substantially across phenotypes. This review summarizes contemporary guideline and consensus recommendations on antiarrhythmic drug use in hypertrophic, dilated, non-dilated left ventricular, and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent guidelines increasingly emphasize phenotype-oriented arrhythmia management, but specific recommendations for antiarrhythmic drug therapy remain fragmented. Beta-blockers and amiodarone are the most consistently recommended agents in structural heart disease, whereas class I drugs are generally restricted. Evidence is strongest for hypertrophic and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, while recommendations for dilated and non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathies are largely extrapolated from broader heart failure populations. Antiarrhythmic drugs are mainly used to reduce arrhythmic burden, symptoms, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies rather than to improve survival. Future studies should define phenotype-specific strategies based on ventricular function, myocardial scar, genotype, and clinical context.

Current Cardiology ReportsVol. 28(1)
University of Trieste (IT), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), Ospedale di Santo Spirito (IT), ERN GUARD-Heart (NL), Ospedale SS. Annunziata (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (IT)
Università degli Studi G. d'Annunzio Chieti - Pescara
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.