Labor and Capital Costs in Estimates of Sources of Labor Productivity Growth for Russian Regions

Abstract— Identifying the reasons for the differentiation of Russian regions in terms of the level and rate of growth of labor productivity is a task that has long attracted the attention of researchers. The tool for solving it is the decomposition of labor productivity growth into contributions from capital–labor ratio and total factor productivity (growth accounting), as well as variations in labor productivity levels (development accounts). This paper uses both approaches, as well as industry and regional data for the period 1995–2023. It is shown that the effective application of development and growth accounts is hampered by a significant discrepancy between the generally accepted alternative estimates of two indicators—fixed capital and the share of wages in gross regional product (GRP). The spread in estimates of the sources of labor productivity growth is particularly strong in regions with a high share of capital-intensive extractive industries, where the discrepancies between both indicators are significant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies on Russian Economic Development
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1075700726700371
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labor and Capital Costs in Estimates of Sources of Labor Productivity Growth for Russian Regions

D. S. Ternovsky, I. B. Voskoboynikov
Studies on Russian Economic Development
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
article

Labor and Capital Costs in Estimates of Sources of Labor Productivity Growth for Russian Regions

D. S. Ternovsky, I. B. Voskoboynikov
article en

Abstract

Abstract— Identifying the reasons for the differentiation of Russian regions in terms of the level and rate of growth of labor productivity is a task that has long attracted the attention of researchers. The tool for solving it is the decomposition of labor productivity growth into contributions from capital–labor ratio and total factor productivity (growth accounting), as well as variations in labor productivity levels (development accounts). This paper uses both approaches, as well as industry and regional data for the period 1995–2023. It is shown that the effective application of development and growth accounts is hampered by a significant discrepancy between the generally accepted alternative estimates of two indicators—fixed capital and the share of wages in gross regional product (GRP). The spread in estimates of the sources of labor productivity growth is particularly strong in regions with a high share of capital-intensive extractive industries, where the discrepancies between both indicators are significant.

Studies on Russian Economic DevelopmentVol. 37(5)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Labor and Capital Costs in Estimates of Sources of Labor Productivity Growth for Russian Regions — D. S. Ternovsky, I. B. Voskoboynikov · Studies on Russian Economic Development (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS