Artificial intelligence in social work practice for children and youth: A scoping review

Abstract Despite artificial intelligence's (AI) established use in healthcare, its application in social work remains nascent. Therefore, this scoping review examines AI's applications, outcomes or perceived effects, and challenges in social work practice for children and youth, especially regarding human–AI collaboration. Searches across eight databases yielded 17 studies spanning four tiers of evidence, ranging from empirical findings to theoretical discussions. AI's applications centered on identifying service users in the five empirically evaluated studies but varied widely in theoretical accounts. Regarding outcomes, only those five studies provided rigorous evaluations, with mixed results. Across all tiers, AI played a supporting role, while social workers retained professional judgment and final decision‐making authority. Last, AI's challenges ranged from technical limitations to ethical and structural concerns, including algorithmic bias, privacy risks, contextual complexity, and unclear accountability. Such limited, uneven evidence suggests priorities for future research and AI's responsible integration in social work for children and youth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Welfare
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.70094
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in social work practice for children and youth: A scoping review

Zhao Lifen, Yong‐Xin Ruan, Antian Chen, Linxia Chen et al.
International Journal of Social Welfare
Social Work Education and Practice
article

Artificial intelligence in social work practice for children and youth: A scoping review

Zhao Lifen, Yong‐Xin Ruan, Antian Chen, Linxia Chen, Ying Feng, Dandan Hu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite artificial intelligence's (AI) established use in healthcare, its application in social work remains nascent. Therefore, this scoping review examines AI's applications, outcomes or perceived effects, and challenges in social work practice for children and youth, especially regarding human–AI collaboration. Searches across eight databases yielded 17 studies spanning four tiers of evidence, ranging from empirical findings to theoretical discussions. AI's applications centered on identifying service users in the five empirically evaluated studies but varied widely in theoretical accounts. Regarding outcomes, only those five studies provided rigorous evaluations, with mixed results. Across all tiers, AI played a supporting role, while social workers retained professional judgment and final decision‐making authority. Last, AI's challenges ranged from technical limitations to ethical and structural concerns, including algorithmic bias, privacy risks, contextual complexity, and unclear accountability. Such limited, uneven evidence suggests priorities for future research and AI's responsible integration in social work for children and youth.

International Journal of Social WelfareVol. 35(4)
Nanjing Normal University (CN), Shenzhen University (CN), Wuhan Business University (CN), Shenzhen Municipal People's Government (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, National Social Science Fund of China
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Social Work Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial intelligence in social work practice for children and youth: A scoping review — Zhao Lifen, Yong‐Xin Ruan, et al. · International Journal of Social Welfare (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS